Hi,
Do the macro_list and fixinc.sh files need to be installed? Does anything
outside of gcc actually use them? If macro_list is a zero length file, can it
be left out of the installation (fixinc.sh seems to test for its presence
before trying to use it) or given a blank line?
The reason I ask
Does sysroot-suffix.h need to be installed even when it's empty? Does
anything outside of gcc actually use it? Can it be left out or given a blank
line? I notice that not all targets produce such a file.
The reason I ask is that rpmlint gives an error on empty files, and
sysroot-suffix.h is emp
Hi,
I've been compiling resources to include in our C Developer resource
guide and I came across a link that isn't working on your site.
It's on this page:
http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/.vhost/www.gnu.org/software/gcc/readings.html
I'm getting an error message when I visit this link:
http://cm.be
On 17 February 2016 at 12:43, Tom Wilcox wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been compiling resources to include in our C Developer resource guide
> and I came across a link that isn't working on your site.
>
> It's on this page:
> http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/.vhost/www.gnu.org/software/gcc/readings.html
That's not
On 17 February 2016 at 13:28, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 17 February 2016 at 12:43, Tom Wilcox wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been compiling resources to include in our C Developer resource guide
>> and I came across a link that isn't working on your site.
>>
>> It's on this page:
>> http://gd.tuwien.ac
Hello,
I inserted a new local var decl in gimple, a pointer which is
malloc'ed and now I am trying to read/write in that memory.
int *mumu;
mumu = malloc ( 40 * sizeof (int));
mumu[1] = 10;
The following statement: mumu[1] = 10; which should look like this
MEM[(int *)mumu_10 + 4B] = 10;
for me,
When I shift a bit field in an expression small bit fields behave
one way and large bit fields another. I'm using gcc 5.3.0 on Arch Linux:
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 5.3.0
Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
wa
On 02/17/2016 04:20 AM, David Howells wrote:
Hi,
Do the macro_list and fixinc.sh files need to be installed? Does anything
outside of gcc actually use them? If macro_list is a zero length file, can it
be left out of the installation (fixinc.sh seems to test for its presence
before trying to us
On 02/17/2016 04:23 AM, David Howells wrote:
Does sysroot-suffix.h need to be installed even when it's empty? Does
anything outside of gcc actually use it? Can it be left out or given a blank
line? I notice that not all targets produce such a file.
The reason I ask is that rpmlint gives an er
Snapshot gcc-4.9-20160217 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20160217/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:04:38AM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:43:08AM +0100, Stefan Sobernig wrote:
>>> Under a recent gcc 6 [*], we run into -Wnonnull warnings using the
>>> nonnull attribute:
>>
>> Yes, this warning has been enhanced for GCC 6.
>>
>>> test.c: In
On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 00:21 +0100, Stefan Sobernig wrote:
> Am I supposed to file this as a bug report then, for the records? Or
> will it be taken care of ...
Jakub already did all the work. Bug filed, patch written, reviewed and
committed. Plus followup fixup. He is amazing:
https://gcc.gnu.org/
12 matches
Mail list logo
