On 01/19/2016 05:04 AM, Woon yung Liu wrote:
Hi,
I'm am trying to complete support for the MIPS R5900, by adding support for its
second
interger multiplication/division pipe. GCC currently supports only the first
one.My target at this moment is the public GCC v5.3.0 release.
To get the 2
On 01/19/2016 04:59 AM, Woon yung Liu wrote:
In my current attempt at adding support for the TI mode, the MMI
definitions are added into a MD file for the R5900 and some functions
(i.e. mips_output_move) were modified to allow certain moves for the
TI mode of the R5900 target. However, while it
On 19/01/16 14:42, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/19/2016 04:59 AM, Woon yung Liu wrote:
>>
>> In my current attempt at adding support for the TI mode, the MMI
>> definitions are added into a MD file for the R5900 and some functions
>> (i.e. mips_output_move) were modified to allow certain moves for the
>
Jeff Law writes:
> On 01/19/2016 04:59 AM, Woon yung Liu wrote:
> >
> > In my current attempt at adding support for the TI mode, the MMI
> > definitions are added into a MD file for the R5900 and some functions
> > (i.e. mips_output_move) were modified to allow certain moves for the
> > TI mode of
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, Moore, Catherine wrote:
> > Does it mean PR target/53276 has been fixed now? What was the commit to
> > add .cfi support for the stubs?
>
> I don't know about the status of PR target/53276. The commit to add
> .cfi support for call stubs was this one:
>
> r184379 | rsand
On 01/19/2016 09:22 AM, Woon yung Liu wrote:
Right now, I do have an old homebrew GCC v3.2.2 port to study as
well, but I didn't follow everything from it because I didn't want to
risk including obsolete constructs. Thanks for the information on the
old Cygnus port. I'll try to scrape together
I've been working on the new version of runtime-selected SH atomics
for musl, and I think what I've got might be appropriate for GCC's
generated atomics too. I know Oleg was not very excited about doing
this on the gcc side from a cost/benefit perspective, but I think my
approach is actually prefer
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:28:52PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
> I've been working on the new version of runtime-selected SH atomics
> for musl, and I think what I've got might be appropriate for GCC's
> generated atomics too. I know Oleg was not very excited about doing
> this on the gcc side from a
Snapshot gcc-5-20160119 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5-20160119/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-5
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Yury Gribov wrote:
> On 01/15/2016 08:44 PM, vivek pandya wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Yury for
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-09/msg01440.html this link.
>> It implements procedure reordering as linker plugin.
>> I have some questions :
>> 1 ) Can you point me
10 matches
Mail list logo
