Hi,
I have attached revamped version of Kugan's patch
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-06/msg00100.html) for PR43721.
Test-case: http://pastebin.com/QMfpXLD9
divmod pass dump: http://pastebin.com/yMY1ikCp
Assembly: http://pastebin.com/kk2HZpvA
The approach I took is similar to sincos pass, which i
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>
> OK, I think I understand what is happening with the MIPS failure when
> converting 'signed char' to '_Sat unsigned _Fract' after I removed
> the TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES macro.
>
> This bug is a combination of two factors, one is that calls
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have attached revamped version of Kugan's patch
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-06/msg00100.html) for PR43721.
> Test-case: http://pastebin.com/QMfpXLD9
> divmod pass dump: http://pastebin.com/yMY1ikCp
> Assembly: http://past
On 10/27/2015 06:09 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:47:19PM +0100, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> what does speak against folding SUBREGs on constants in fold_rtx?
>>
>> CSE does refuse to propagate constants into subreg expressions probably
>> because fold_rtx does not
On 10/30/2015 02:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>> So should __satfractqiuhq be dealing with the fact that the argument 'a'
>> may not have been sign extend in the correct way?
>
> No. GCC should ensure libcalls (yes, they are speical for some
On 10/29/2015 1:47 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 10/27/2015 02:05 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/25/2015 09:41 PM, David Wohlferd wrote:
Does gcc's inline asm support multi-alternative constraints? Or are
they only supported for md?
dw
PS If it *is* supported, then the docs need some work.
I t
