Re: gnat 4.9.2 on arm with rtems

2015-10-29 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 28/10/15 15:22, Jan Sommer wrote: I got it working. The Set function was always overwriting the address of the previous ATCB, so STPO.Self was always returning the ATCB of the task created last. It turns out that I was building rtems without the --enable-ada option. The option is not mentio

Re: gnat 4.9.2 on arm with rtems

2015-10-29 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 10/29/2015 5:46 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 28/10/15 15:22, Jan Sommer wrote: I got it working. The Set function was always overwriting the address of the previous ATCB, so STPO.Self was always returning the ATCB of the task created last. It turns out that I was building rtems without t

RE: Write after approval question

2015-10-29 Thread Claudiu Zissulescu
Thank you Jeff for the clarifications Best, Claudiu > -Original Message- > From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 6:30 PM > To: Claudiu Zissulescu; gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: Francois Bedard; jeremy.benn...@embecosm.com; g...@amylaar.uk > Subject: Re: Write

Re: _Fract types and conversion routines

2015-10-29 Thread Steve Ellcey
OK, I think I understand what is happening with the MIPS failure when converting 'signed char' to '_Sat unsigned _Fract' after I removed the TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES macro. This bug is a combination of two factors, one is that calls to library functions (like __satfractqiuhq) don't necessarily g

Re: inline asm and multi-alternative constraints

2015-10-29 Thread Richard Henderson
On 10/27/2015 02:05 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 10/25/2015 09:41 PM, David Wohlferd wrote: >> Does gcc's inline asm support multi-alternative constraints? Or are >> they only supported for md? >> >> The fact that it is doc'ed with the other constraints >> (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Constrain