> @Arnaud: I saw quite a lot of #pragma Debug-lines in the rts-code. Is there a
> simple way of activating them without having to recompile gnat?
No, you need to compile the runtime with -gnata to enable assertions and
enable support for pragma Debug. You can add gnata to GNATLIBFLAGS
in libada/Ma
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Yasser Shalabi wrote:
> So back to square one. Any tips on what code/config-files I need to
> modify with to get GCC to emit additional opcodes for certain
> instructions?
Maybe you should try cross-compiling. It looks like you have already
succeeded with the inst
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 6:59 AM, sameera wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 October 2015 05:23 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:20 PM, sameera
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Richard,
>>>
>>> This is with reference to our discussion at GNU Tools Cauldron 2015
>>> regarding my talk titled "Im
Hi,
what does speak against folding SUBREGs on constants in fold_rtx?
CSE does refuse to propagate constants into subreg expressions probably because
fold_rtx does not
handle it - and in fact a subreg on a constant does not seem to be defined. I'm
wondering why this
is the case? What's the prob
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:47:19PM +0100, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what does speak against folding SUBREGs on constants in fold_rtx?
>
> CSE does refuse to propagate constants into subreg expressions probably
> because fold_rtx does not
> handle it - and in fact a subreg on a constant do
On 10/25/2015 09:41 PM, David Wohlferd wrote:
Does gcc's inline asm support multi-alternative constraints? Or are
they only supported for md?
The fact that it is doc'ed with the other constraints
(https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Constraints.html) says it works for
inline. But https://gcc.gn
Snapshot gcc-5-20151027 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5-20151027/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-5
I have a question about the _Fract types and their conversion routines.
If I compile this program:
extern void abort (void);
int main ()
{
signed char a = -1;
_Sat unsigned _Fract b = a;
if (b != 0.0ur)
abort();
return 0;
}
with -O0 and on a MIPS32 system where char is 1 byte and uns
