Hello,
I try to get the a working gnat toolchain running to build binaries for the
raspberry pi with rtems4.11.
For debugging purposes the pi is emulated in qemu.
Currently I try to get the following basic tasking example to run:
with Text_IO; use Text_IO;
procedure Hello is
task Hello_Tas
> After rtems initialization a thread is created which calls the gnat_main
> function and then runs the rts and the task.
> What I see so far is that after the hello_tasks delays itself the
> Complete_Master procedure (s-tassta.adb:444) is called, but with
> Self_Id set to the Id of the hello_task.
On 15.10.2015 17:57, Cary Coutant wrote:
PR gold/19119
* options.h (General_options): Remove "obsolete" from -m.
I'm a little reluctant to remove "obsolete" from the description --
maybe "deprecated" instead?
* parameters.cc (set_parameters_target): Check if input t
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 15.10.2015 17:57, Cary Coutant wrote:
>>>
>>> PR gold/19119
>>> * options.h (General_options): Remove "obsolete" from -m.
>>
>>
>> I'm a little reluctant to remove "obsolete" from the description --
>> maybe "deprecated
Am Sunday 25 October 2015, 18:13:53 schrieb Arnaud Charlet:
> > After rtems initialization a thread is created which calls the gnat_main
> > function and then runs the rts and the task.
> > What I see so far is that after the hello_tasks delays itself the
> > Complete_Master procedure (s-tassta.adb
> > > I would like to know from where Complete_Master is called to break there
> > > and
> > > find out why it uses the wrong id.
> >
> > Why don't you simply put a breakpoint on Complete_Master?
>
> That's how I found out about the wrong/weird Self_Id.
Then you should also get a backtrace which
Snapshot gcc-6-20151025 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20151025/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision
On 25.10.2015 18:40, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 15.10.2015 17:57, Cary Coutant wrote:
PR gold/19119
* options.h (General_options): Remove "obsolete" from -m.
I'm a little reluctant to remove "obsolete" from the description
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 25.10.2015 18:40, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15.10.2015 17:57, Cary Coutant wrote:
>
>
> PR gold/19119
> * options.h (General_options): Remo
On 26.10.2015 01:14, H.J. Lu wrote:
Please open a gold bug with missing emulations.
PR gold/19172
Does gcc's inline asm support multi-alternative constraints? Or are
they only supported for md?
The fact that it is doc'ed with the other constraints
(https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Constraints.html) says it works for
inline. But https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10396#c17 say
On Wednesday 21 October 2015 05:23 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:20 PM, sameera wrote:
Hi Richard,
This is with reference to our discussion at GNU Tools Cauldron 2015
regarding my talk titled "Improving the effectiveness and generality of GCC
auto-vectorization." We, at
12 matches
Mail list logo
