On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:55:48PM -0700, David Wohlferd wrote:
> >> On systems where an underscore is normally prepended to the name of a C
> >>-function or variable, this feature allows you to define names for the
> >>+variable, this feature allows you to define names for the
> >> linker that d
On 31/07/15 12:04, Alex Velenko wrote:
On 29/07/15 23:14, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/28/2015 12:18 PM, Alex Velenko wrote:
On 21/04/15 06:27, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/20/2015 01:09 AM, Shiva Chen wrote:
Hi, Jeff
Thanks for your advice.
can_replace_by.patch is the new patch to handle both cases.
On 18 August 2015 at 10:25, Alex Velenko wrote:
>
>
> On 31/07/15 12:04, Alex Velenko wrote:
>>
>> On 29/07/15 23:14, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/28/2015 12:18 PM, Alex Velenko wrote:
On 21/04/15 06:27, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 04/20/2015 01:09 AM, Shiva Chen wrote:
>>
>>
On 18/08/15 10:45, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 18 August 2015 at 10:25, Alex Velenko wrote:
On 31/07/15 12:04, Alex Velenko wrote:
On 29/07/15 23:14, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/28/2015 12:18 PM, Alex Velenko wrote:
On 21/04/15 06:27, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/20/2015 01:09 AM, Shiva Chen wrot
> On fsf-4.9 I see the test pass:
>
> PASS: gcc.target/arm/pr43920-2.c (test for excess errors)
> PASS: gcc.target/arm/pr43920-2.c scan-assembler-times pop 2
> PASS: gcc.target/arm/pr43920-2.c scan-assembler-times beq 3
> Executing on host: arm-none-eabi-size pr43920-2.o (timeout = 300)
> spawn
> Hi Marcus,
>
> On fsf-4.9 I see the test pass:
>
> PASS: gcc.target/arm/pr43920-2.c (test for excess errors)
> PASS: gcc.target/arm/pr43920-2.c scan-assembler-times pop 2
> PASS: gcc.target/arm/pr43920-2.c scan-assembler-times beq 3
> Executing on host: arm-none-eabi-size pr43920-2.o (timeou
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:29:41PM -0700, Cary Coutant wrote:
> > So far, I've been prototyping static PIE support by having GCC pass
> > the following options to ld instead of -static -pie:
> >
> > -static -shared -Bsymbolic
> >
> > This partly works, but since ld does not know it's produc
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:42:56PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 02:19:34PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
>> > > For background on the static PIE model I'm working with, s
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 08:56:00AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:42:56PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 02:19:34PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 08:56:00AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:42:56PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 02:19:34PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
Hi all,
Kaz and I have been discussing the SH5/SH64 status, which is part of the SH
port, every now and then. To our knowledge, there is no real hardware
available as of today and we don't think there are any real users for a
SH5/SH64 toolchain out there. Moreover, the SH5/SH64 parts of the S
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Oleg Endo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Kaz and I have been discussing the SH5/SH64 status, which is part of the SH
> port, every now and then. To our knowledge, there is no real hardware
> available as of today and we don't think there are any real users for a
> SH5/SH
On 08/18/2015 11:11 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Oleg Endo
wrote:
Hi all,
Kaz and I have been discussing the SH5/SH64 status, which is part
of the SH port, every now and then. To our knowledge, there is no
real hardware available as of today and we don't think th
Snapshot gcc-5-20150818 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5-20150818/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-5
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:30:56AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 08:56:00AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:42:56PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:30:56AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 08:56:00AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
>> >> > On
On 08/03/2015 12:35 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi
Just noticed this building the head for arm-rtems4.11. Should
the first comparison be eliminated and, maybe, a comment added?
ctype_members.cc:216:14: warning: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0
is always true [-Wtype-limits]
if (__wc >=
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 08:58:43PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> I've updated the patch to cover the changes needed for all the
> elf??-*.c target files (lots of code duplication already there), skip
> the clearing of command_line.interpreter, and based it on current git
> master with your output_typ
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 01:30:12PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 08:58:43PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > I've updated the patch to cover the changes needed for all the
> > elf??-*.c target files (lots of code duplication already there), skip
> > the clearing of command_line.in
> This is OK to commit with a suitable ChangeLog. I think a separate ld
> option is best too, because historically -static and its aliases
> -Bstatic, -dn, -non_shared really are about what type of libraries are
> accepted rather than choosing linker output type.
Gold actually separates these con
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:34:45PM -0700, Cary Coutant wrote:
> > This is OK to commit with a suitable ChangeLog. I think a separate ld
> > option is best too, because historically -static and its aliases
> > -Bstatic, -dn, -non_shared really are about what type of libraries are
> > accepted rathe
> Does static pie (ET_DYN with non-fixed load address, _DYNAMIC
> relocations, but no PT_INTERP, DT_NEEDEDs, or symbolic relocations)
> currently work with gold? If so, what is the way to request it? I
> would say it would make sense to try to do things the same, but from
> what you're saying it so
22 matches
Mail list logo
