Re: [gcc libcc1] build_qualified_type for self-referencing/incomplete types

On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 17:22:13 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > How to get 'volatile struct sv' GCC 'tree' type for: > volatile struct sv { volatile struct sv *p; }; I have found out how it can work, even with no change on the GCC side: Instead of current: plugin_build_record_type:

Second GCC 5.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

The second release candidate for GCC 5.1 is available from ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5.0.1-RC-20150418 and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 11. Because the release candidate uses 5.0.1 as its version (5.1.0 is reserved for the GA 5.1 release only, see

Second GCC 5.1 Release Candidate successful avr target build

On a x86_64 linux box I successfully built a gcc RC-20150418 toolchain including binutils-2.25 and avr-libc r2473(svn). I noticed some warnings in the logs: ../../../source/gcc-5.0.1-RC-20150418/gcc/vec.h:1048: warning: invalid access to non-static data member âvec::m_vecdataâ of NULL object

Re: is it time to mass change from .c to .cc in gcc/ ?

Started with the latter. By the way, what is the policy concerning getting write access to the wiki? You are expected to ask one of the existing editors who's willing to vouch for you to add you to the EditorGroup: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/EditorGroup Martin

NIOS and atomic primitives

Hi with nios2-rtems on gcc 4.9.2, we are getting undefineds for some atomic primitives. Are these implemented or is some magic bit of configurery missing for nios-rtems? __sync_fetch_and_add_4 is missing on a simple C++ IO streams sanity test. Thanks -- Joel Sherrill Ask me about RTEMS: a free

Re: NIOS and atomic primitives

On 04/18/2015 07:35 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi with nios2-rtems on gcc 4.9.2, we are getting undefineds for some atomic primitives. Are these implemented or is some magic bit of configurery missing for nios-rtems? __sync_fetch_and_add_4 is missing on a simple C++ IO streams sanity test. libg