Hi!
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 22:28:41 +, Aditya K wrote:
> So I have modified the patch to use hash_map instead of std::map. The patch
> is attached.
>
> However, I got one regression after that.
>
> # Comparing directories
> ## Dir1=../build-pristine/: 11 sum files
> ## Dir2=../build-test/: 11
In the past (at least it worked for me in 4.9) it was possible to use the
uninstalled C & C++ compilers to build another compiler, using the just built
compilers. Useful if you want to build e.g. libgccjit in a second step without
bootstrapping again. This doesn't seem to work anymore with 5. At
Matthias Klose writes:
> and the next build (without bootstrapping) with these values. Did somebody got
> this working?
That's how target libraries are built.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And no
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 03:15:22PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:31 PM, xue yinsong wrote:
> > I think the gimple front end project would be quite useful to gcc so I’d
> > like to do work on it this summer.
> >
> > The problem is, it seems the GIMPLE front end project h
On 03/31/2015 01:09 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> In the past (at least it worked for me in 4.9) it was possible to use the
> uninstalled C & C++ compilers to build another compiler, using the just built
> compilers. Useful if you want to build e.g. libgccjit in a second step
> without
> bootstrapp
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:37:27PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 03/31/2015 01:09 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > In the past (at least it worked for me in 4.9) it was possible to use the
> > uninstalled C & C++ compilers to build another compiler, using the just
> > built
> > compilers. Useful
> From: tho...@codesourcery.com
> To: hiradi...@msn.com
> CC: richard.guent...@gmail.com; tbsau...@tbsaunde.org; gcc@gcc.gnu.org;
> prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org
> Subject: RE: Proposal for adding splay_tree_find (to find elements without
> updating the
I want to modify gcc 4.9.2 so that array subscripting expressions a[b]
generate a new instruction/syscall foo(a, b) (that is, taking a and b
as arguments) rather than just being turned into *(a+b).
Further, I want accesses into multi-dimensional arrays a[b][c] to turn
into foo(a, (b * row_size + c
