On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf
wrote:
> On 2015.03.20 at 20:08 -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> What was the final decision concerning future versioning of FSF
>> gcc post-5.0? In particular, I am confused about the designation of
>> maintenance releases of 5.0. Will the nex
On 2015.03.21 at 12:11 -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> wrote:
> > On 2015.03.20 at 20:08 -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> >> What was the final decision concerning future versioning of FSF
> >> gcc post-5.0? In particular, I am confused about the
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 15:43:21 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote:
> It seems like there should be some kind of reference to &op0, that is,
> lowering ATSIGN_EXPR to *(typeof(OP0)[OP1]*)(&OP0).
OK, I got it now. I was using GDB-like 'struct type *' where 'struct value *'
should have been as in GCC both are 't
I add the following code in parser.c to replace htab:
…
struct gimple_symtab_hasher : ggc_cache_hasher
{
/* Return the hash value of the declaration name of a gimple_symtab_entry_def
object pointed by ENTRY. */
static hashval_t hash(struct gimple_symtab_entry_def *base){return
IDENTIFIER_H
