Hi all. It's possible my code is doing something illegal, but it's also
possible I've found a problem with -O3 optimization in GCC 4.9.2. I've
built this same code with GCC 4.8.2 -O3 on GNU/Linux and it works fine.
It also works with GCC 4.9.2 with lower -O (-O2 for example).
When I try a build
On 2015.01.06 at 03:18 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> Hi all. It's possible my code is doing something illegal, but it's also
> possible I've found a problem with -O3 optimization in GCC 4.9.2. I've
> built this same code with GCC 4.8.2 -O3 on GNU/Linux and it works fine.
> It also works with GCC 4.9
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 03:18:48AM -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> Hi all. It's possible my code is doing something illegal, but it's also
> possible I've found a problem with -O3 optimization in GCC 4.9.2. I've
> built this same code with GCC 4.8.2 -O3 on GNU/Linux and it works fine.
> It also works
Hello!
There's a link to "GCC5" right on top of the News section on the home page of
gcc.gnu.org that takes me to a 403 forbidden access page:
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ .
I think it's a bug.
Bye!
Tomas
On 6 January 2015 at 09:34, wrote:
>
> Hello!
> There's a link to "GCC5" right on top of the News section on the home page of
> gcc.gnu.org that takes me to a 403 forbidden access page:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ .
> I think it's a bug.
Yes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64469
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:27:29AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 6 January 2015 at 09:34, wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> > There's a link to "GCC5" right on top of the News section on the home page
> > of gcc.gnu.org that takes me to a 403 forbidden access page:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ .
>
On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 09:43 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 03:18:48AM -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> > Hi all. It's possible my code is doing something illegal, but it's also
> > possible I've found a problem with -O3 optimization in GCC 4.9.2. I've
> > built this same code wit
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 08:50:58AM -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 09:43 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 03:18:48AM -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> > > Hi all. It's possible my code is doing something illegal, but it's also
> > > possible I've found a problem wi
On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 09:43 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> GCC trunk -fsanitize=undefined (in particular
> -fsanitize=nonnull-attribute)
> diagnoses it:
> /tmp/mystring.cpp:103:26: runtime error: null pointer passed as
> argument 2, which is declared to never be null
Unfortunately adding -fsanitize
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 11:28:52AM -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 09:43 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > GCC trunk -fsanitize=undefined (in particular
> > -fsanitize=nonnull-attribute)
> > diagnoses it:
> > /tmp/mystring.cpp:103:26: runtime error: null pointer passed as
> > argumen
10 matches
Mail list logo