GCC 4.8.4 Status Report (2014-12-05)

2014-12-05 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Status == It is time for another 4.8 release, I'd like to create 4.8.4 release candidate at the end of the next week and if all goes well, 4.8.4 release a week after that. If you have any safe fixes you'd like to be backported, please do so soon, and if there are any known issues on the branc

Re: GCC 4.8.4 Status Report (2014-12-05)

2014-12-05 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Status > == > > It is time for another 4.8 release, I'd like to create 4.8.4 release > candidate at the end of the next week and if all goes well, 4.8.4 release > a week after that. If you have any safe fixes you'd like to be backported,

Re: GCC 4.8.4 Status Report (2014-12-05)

2014-12-05 Thread David Edelsohn
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Status > == > > It is time for another 4.8 release, I'd like to create 4.8.4 release > candidate at the end of the next week and if all goes well, 4.8.4 release > a week after that. If you have any safe fixes you'd like to be backported,

Re: [patch, build] Restore bootstrap in building libcc1 on darwin

2014-12-05 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 01:06:45AM +0100, FX wrote: > tl;dr: One question to build maintainers, and one patch submitted to toplevel > configure.ac > > --- > > I’m looked into the issue some more, and am comparing two builds of trunk > (exact same source), one configured with system

Re: [patch, build] Restore bootstrap in building libcc1 on darwin

2014-12-05 Thread Dominique Dhumieres
> ... > Can you please test it on Darwin (or whatever other target has similar > issues with bootstrapping libcc1)? > > 2014-12-05 Jakub Jelinek > ... The patch does not work for x86_64-apple-darwin14.0.0. However the following patch does: --- ../_clean/Makefile.in 2014-11-26 23:09:14.0

Re: [patch, build] Restore bootstrap in building libcc1 on darwin

2014-12-05 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 08:11:53PM +0100, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: > > ... > > Can you please test it on Darwin (or whatever other target has similar > > issues with bootstrapping libcc1)? > > > > 2014-12-05 Jakub Jelinek > > ... > > The patch does not work for x86_64-apple-darwin14.0.0. Howe

Re: [patch, build] Restore bootstrap in building libcc1 on darwin

2014-12-05 Thread Dominique Dhumieres
> As I've tried to explain, that is IMHO wrong though. > If what you are after is the -B stuff too, then perhaps: > ... Sorry but it does not work: true DO=all multi-do # make make[4]: Leaving directory '/opt/gcc/build_w/libbacktrace' make[3]: Leaving directory '/opt/gcc/build_w/libbacktrace' ma

Re: [patch, build] Restore bootstrap in building libcc1 on darwin

2014-12-05 Thread Jeff Law
On 12/05/14 15:34, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: As I've tried to explain, that is IMHO wrong though. If what you are after is the -B stuff too, then perhaps: ... Sorry but it does not work: BTW, thanks for working with Jakub on this. We're going to be getting a Darwin box for Jakub and other fo

Re: [patch, build] Restore bootstrap in building libcc1 on darwin

2014-12-05 Thread Phil Muldoon
On 05/12/14 22:40, Jeff Law wrote: > On 12/05/14 15:34, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: >>> As I've tried to explain, that is IMHO wrong though. >>> If what you are after is the -B stuff too, then perhaps: >>> ... >> >> Sorry but it does not work: > BTW, thanks for working with Jakub on this. We're goi

Re: [patch, build] Restore bootstrap in building libcc1 on darwin

2014-12-05 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 11:34:28PM +0100, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: > > As I've tried to explain, that is IMHO wrong though. > > If what you are after is the -B stuff too, then perhaps: > > ... > > Sorry but it does not work: Sorry, make that (just removed 4x ' in each file): 2014-12-05 Jakub

Re: [patch, build] Restore bootstrap in building libcc1 on darwin

2014-12-05 Thread Dominique d'Humières
Bootstrap just finished with the patch. Thanks, Dominique > Le 5 déc. 2014 à 23:47, Jakub Jelinek a écrit : > > On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 11:34:28PM +0100, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: >>> As I've tried to explain, that is IMHO wrong though. >>> If what you are after is the -B stuff too, then perh