On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 09:01:14PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 08.11.2014 20:49, Roman Gareev wrote:
> >>Sounds good as long as they will compile and pass tests independently.
> >>Please also remember updating the documentation.
> >
> >I’m trying to build Graphite without CLooG, but I get the
Snapshot gcc-5-20141109 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5-20141109/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision
Forgive me if this has been raised before -- I tried searching the
archives but couldn't think of good keywords that would weed out
unrelated posts
I was checking the testing requirements for a C front end patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#testing
and noticed that the policy is to
On 9 November 2014 23:13, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> Forgive me if this has been raised before -- I tried searching the archives
> but couldn't think of good keywords that would weed out unrelated posts
>
> I was checking the testing requirements for a C front end patch
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/
On 11/09/14 16:13, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#testing
and noticed that the policy is to require a complete bootstrap for C
changes, but not for C++. Given that GCC's implementation language is
now C++, isn't that backwards? I'm not trying to weasel out of the
e
