Hello,
Statement : A *a = new B;
gets translated in GIMPLE as
1. void * D.2805;
2. struct A * a;
3. D.2805 = operator new (20);
4. a = D.2805;
A is the base class and B is the derived class.
In statement 3, new operator is creating an object of derived class B.
By analyzing the RHS of the assig
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, Swati Rathi wrote:
Statement : A *a = new B;
gets translated in GIMPLE as
1. void * D.2805;
2. struct A * a;
3. D.2805 = operator new (20);
4. a = D.2805;
A is the base class and B is the derived class.
In statement 3, new operator is creating an object of derived class B.
On Monday 06 October 2014 02:28 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, Swati Rathi wrote:
Statement : A *a = new B;
gets translated in GIMPLE as
1. void * D.2805;
2. struct A * a;
3. D.2805 = operator new (20);
4. a = D.2805;
A is the base class and B is the derived class.
In statement 3,
Hello,
Actually MILEPOST link is quite outdated. We now have a new
python-based Collective Mind framework which includes universal
multi-dimensional multi-objective auto-tuner with a web-based interface.
If you are interested, you may find some optimization flags and parameters
for different
Hi,
I am sending this bug report here because I can't register an account
in bugzilla...
gcc version: gcc-linaro-4.9-2014.09 (I checked also the main repo git,
the code is the same)
kernel: 2.6.37
"home/daniel/Downloads/.build/src/gcc-custom/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limit
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:41 AM, David Wohlferd wrote:
>
>> You want
>>
>> "=m" (*( struct foo { char x[8]; } __attribute__((may_alias)) *)Dest)
>
>
> Thank you. With your help, that worse-than-useless sample in the docs is
> getting closer to something people can actually use.
>
> Except for one
