On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> Currently, we treat predicates as "second-class" citizens:
> - assume any identifier as a valid predicate
> - cannot write more complex predicates than an identifier in match-op
>
> I was wondering whether it would be a good idea
> to av
Dear GCC Developers!
May I ask you regarding how you make a decision whether implement some
optimization or not?
As far as I know, there are so many configurations (frontends x
backends x applications(benchmarks) x etc), that the same optimization
could improve performance in one configuration and
Dear GCC Developers!
Could you please clarify about GIMPLE loop passes?
Where could I find the latest changes in these passes? Is it trunk or
some of the branches? May I look at some RoadMap on GIMPLE loop
optimizations?
Actually, I ask these questions because I would like to contribute to
GCC.
Hello,
GHC (Haskell compiler) is using builtin gcc's cpp for its cpp
capability. The problem is a little bit different behaviour on
different platform which I observed. As one of GHC's testcases
completely unrelated to gcc's cpp we use:
{-# LANGUAGE CPP #-}
module T7145b ( A.Applicative(pure) ) w
On 08/08/14 06:18, Evgeniya Maenkova wrote:
As far as I know, there are so many configurations (frontends x
backends x applications(benchmarks) x etc), that the same optimization
could improve performance in one configuration and degrade at other
conditions.
Correct.
What performance tests do
More information: It looks like gcc driver invokes cc1 with -P option
which switches off linemakers on Solaris. On Linux cc1 is invoked
without -P and so linemakers are presented. The question is why on
Solaris -P is added to the options since I don't use it myself. It's
inserted by gcc itself...
Hi Karel,
> More information: It looks like gcc driver invokes cc1 with -P option
> which switches off linemakers on Solaris. On Linux cc1 is invoked
> without -P and so linemakers are presented. The question is why on
> Solaris -P is added to the options since I don't use it myself. It's
> insert
Hi Rainer,
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> Hi Karel,
>
>> More information: It looks like gcc driver invokes cc1 with -P option
>> which switches off linemakers on Solaris. On Linux cc1 is invoked
>> without -P and so linemakers are presented. The question is why on
>> Solar
Hi Karel,
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Rainer Orth
> wrote:
>> Hi Karel,
>>
>>> More information: It looks like gcc driver invokes cc1 with -P option
>>> which switches off linemakers on Solaris. On Linux cc1 is invoked
>>> without -P and so linemakers are presented. The question is why on
