> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf
> Of Andi Kleen
> Sent: 20 July 2014 22:29
> To: Paulo Matos
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: GCC version bikeshedding
>
> Paulo Matos writes:
> >
> > That's what I understood as well. Someon
Dear gcc contributors,
could you please answer a few questions about the implementation of
vec.h? Should we always use “create” to initialize, for example,
vec or is it possible to do it using “safe_grow_cleared”
or a similar function? There is "vec_safe_grow_cleared", which works
with vec. Is the
Andi Kleen writes:
> Sounds like a bad idea, as then there would be non unique gcc versions.
> redhat gcc 5.0.2 potentially being completely different from suse gcc
> 5.0.2
How is that different from now?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1C
I've attached the patch, which contains generation of Gimple code from
isl_ast_node_block.
However, I've found out a problem. The following example:
int k = 50;
static int __attribute__((noinline))
foo ()
{
int i, res;
for (i = 0, res = 0; i < k; i++)
res += i;
return res;
}
extern vo
On 21/07/2014 14:23, Roman Gareev wrote:
I've attached the patch, which contains generation of Gimple code from
isl_ast_node_block.
However, I've found out a problem. The following example:
int k = 50;
static int __attribute__((noinline))
foo ()
{
int i, res;
for (i = 0, res = 0; i < k; i
> It seems S_6 is now scheduled before S_4 which is surprising, as
> dependences from S_4 to S_6 should prevent us from generating a schedule
> that yields such a result. What is the schedule that you give to the isl ast
> generator?
The schedule generated by the code, which uses variable k (It ex
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Roman Gareev wrote:
> Dear gcc contributors,
>
> could you please answer a few questions about the implementation of
> vec.h? Should we always use “create” to initialize, for example,
> vec or is it possible to do it using “safe_grow_cleared”
> or a similar functio
On 21/07/2014 14:55, Roman Gareev wrote:
It seems S_6 is now scheduled before S_4 which is surprising, as
dependences from S_4 to S_6 should prevent us from generating a schedule
that yields such a result. What is the schedule that you give to the isl ast
generator?
The schedule generated by th
On 20/07/14 22:28, Andi Kleen wrote:
Paulo Matos writes:
That's what I understood as well. Someone mentioned to leave the patch
level number to the distros to use which sounded like a good idea.
Sounds like a bad idea, as then there would be non unique gcc versions.
redhat gcc 5.0.2 potentiall
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Alec Teal wrote:
> Agreed (no experience, but I wouldn't want to live in a world where what
> Andi
> describes is the case!)
We already live in that world. This would not change that. I quite
like the proposal.
> What is "Bikeshedding"? I've not heard this term
Hi,
I am a freelancer contracted to fix some bugs in the fortran compiler. I
understand that I need to transfer the copyright of that effort to the FSF. My
client and me are willing to sign any paperwork needed for that. Unfortunately
my client will be on holiday from Thursday on.
What do I need
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> These end up taking different codepaths through the compiler () because
> __builtin_lround has to take -fmath-errno into account and does not end up
> getting inlined (generating a call to the library lround).
That suggests this transformation is buggy
Hi,
I've created a wiki page about offloading. Any improvements are welcome.
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Offloading
Thanks,
-- Ilya
> Was this a Cauldron thing? Could you summarise it for the people who
> weren't there? I don't strongly object, but it seems like unnecessary
> churn (especially in terms of user expectations).
Yeah, bumping the major version number every year is a bit ridiculous. Not as
ridiculous as Firefox
Hi list
When I compare gcc 4.8 in gcc 4.9
gcc 4.9 Very slow
When I use g++
I have been looking at asm_fprintf in final.c, and I think there's a
design flaw. But since the change affects ARM and since I have no
access to an ARM system, I need a second opinion.
asm_fprintf allows platforms to add support for new format specifiers by
using the ASM_FPRINTF_EXTENSIONS ma
16 matches
Mail list logo
