On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 02-07-14 08:23, Marc Glisse wrote:
I think it could have used (match_dup 0) instead of operand 1, if there
had been only the first alternative. And then the constraint would have
been +&.
isn't that explicitly listed as unsupported here (
https://g
On 02-07-14 09:02, Marc Glisse wrote:
Still, the meaning of +&, in inline asm for instance, seems relatively clear,
no?
I can't find any testsuite examples using this construct.
Furthermore, I'd expect the same semantics and restrictions for constraints in
rtl templates and inline asm.
So
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 02-07-14 09:02, Marc Glisse wrote:
Still, the meaning of +&, in inline asm for instance, seems relatively
clear, no?
I can't find any testsuite examples using this construct.
Furthermore, I'd expect the same semantics and restrictions for constraint
The CppCon 2014 Program is now available with talk titles, abstracts,
and speakers:
http://cppcon.org/conference-program/
The program contains over 100 one-hour sessions by over 70 speakers
including plenary sessions by Scott Meyers and Herb Sutter, as well
as the keynotes by C++ creator Bjarne S
On 02-07-14 11:36, Marc Glisse wrote:
(did you drop the lists on purpose?)
That was a glitch, sorry.
[ Adds list back ]
Thanks,
- Tom
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
An earlyclobber operand X prevents *other* input operands from using the same
register, but that does not include X
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 10:40:06AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> on some linux architectures there are some symbols missing in libstdc++.so.6
> built from the 4.9 branch. I didn't notice before due to a packaging bug.
> affected are ARM32, HPPA, SPARC.
>
> - ARM32 (build log [1], both soft and
On 2 July 2014 08:02, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
>
>> On 02-07-14 08:23, Marc Glisse wrote:
>>>
>>> I think it could have used (match_dup 0) instead of operand 1, if there
>>> had been only the first alternative. And then the constraint would have been
>>> +&.
>>
On 2014-07-01, 3:27 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
Vladimir,
There are a few patterns which use both the read/write constraint
modifier (+) and the earlyclobber constraint modifier (&):
So my question is: is the combination of '&' and '+' supported ? If so,
what is the exact semantics ? If not, shou
On 07/01/14 13:58, Marc Glisse wrote:
I don't think we can define any reasonable semantics for &+. My
recommendation would be for this to be considered a hard error.
Uh? The doc explicitly says "An input operand can be tied to an
earlyclobber operand" and goes on to explain why that is useful.
On 07/02/14 00:23, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 01-07-14 21:58, Marc Glisse wrote:
So my question is: is the combination of '&' and '+' supported ? If
so,
what is the exact semantics ? If not, should we warn or give an
error ?
I don't think we can define any r
Hi,
I have set up a French gcc mirror. It is located in Roubaix, France. It
is reachable through http, ftp and rsync:
http://mirror.bbln.nl/gcc
ftp://mirror.bbln.nl/gcc
rsync://mirror.bbln.nl/gcc
This mirror is provided by BBLN. Could you add it to the mirrorlist?
If you have any questions plea
I’ve recently added IEEE support for the Fortran front-end and library. As part
of that, the front-end should be able to determine which of the available
floating-point types are IEEE-conforming [1]. Right now, I’ve taken a
conservative approach and only considered the target’s float_type_node a
On 1-Jul-14, at 4:40 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
Looks like more than one issue is involved, I remember that the
math symbols were already dropped in earlier versions for other
architectures. The build is configured -with-long-double-128.
Long double is 64 bits on hppa-linux.
Dave
--
John
On 01/07/14 20:58, John David Anglin wrote:
On 1-Jul-14, at 5:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 1 July 2014 09:40, Matthias Klose wrote:
- HPPA (build log [2]), is missing all the future_base symbols and
exception_ptr13exception symbols, current_exception and
rethrow_exception.
This i
On 01/07/14 09:40, Matthias Klose wrote:
on some linux architectures there are some symbols missing in libstdc++.so.6
built from the 4.9 branch. I didn't notice before due to a packaging bug.
affected are ARM32, HPPA, SPARC.
- ARM32 (build log [1], both soft and hard float) are missing
Snapshot gcc-4.9-20140702 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20140702/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Dear GCC Team,
As there are no test results listed for GCC 4.8.3 in GCC buildstats/testresults
page, I am re-sending the test results as below:
Regards,
Raghunath Lolur.
On Tuesday, 1 July 2014 1:41 AM, Raghu L wrote:
Dear GCC Team,
I would like to inform a successful native bootstrap build
17 matches
Mail list logo
