gcc-4.10-20140629 is now available

2014-06-29 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.10-20140629 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.10-20140629/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.10 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

RE: broken links?

2014-06-29 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote: > you are right - must be a Firefox problem; I had no problem using wget, IE8 > works as well > Firefox is still redirected to https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ > though Does it work for you know? We made a number of changes in the la

Re: broken links?

2014-06-29 Thread Ingwie Phoenix
Am 30.06.2014 um 01:12 schrieb Gerald Pfeifer : > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote: >> you are right - must be a Firefox problem; I had no problem using wget, IE8 >> works as well >> Firefox is still redirected to https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ >> though > > Does

RE: broken links?

2014-06-29 Thread Hebenstreit, Michael
Could our firewall (plus proxy) be the reason? I still get "page no found" for both Firefox 25 and IE Michael -Original Message- From: Ingwie Phoenix [mailto:ingwie2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 5:15 PM To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: Hebenstreit, Michael; Jonathan Wakely; gcc@

Re: broken links?

2014-06-29 Thread Ingwie Phoenix
Am 30.06.2014 um 01:43 schrieb Hebenstreit, Michael : > Could our firewall (plus proxy) be the reason? I still get "page no found" > for both Firefox 25 and IE > > Michael Does the proxy have a cache? Some proxys have something similar to a browser cache - in fact, more compareable with what

RE: broken links?

2014-06-29 Thread Hebenstreit, Michael
Unlikely I think - considering the timeframe and how many requests the cache would have to take on -Original Message- From: Ingwie Phoenix [mailto:ingwie2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 7:53 PM To: Hebenstreit, Michael Cc: Gerald Pfeifer; Jonathan Wakely; gcc@gcc.gnu.org

RE: Folding a bitfield in a union

2014-06-29 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
> From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 6:23 PM > > Yes - I was specifically looking for an early out to avoid wrong-code. > So, is size % BITS_PER_UNIT != 0 a working fix to avoid the wrong-code > issues with bitfields (on big-endian targets)? I'm

RE: broken links?

2014-06-29 Thread Hebenstreit, Michael
I tested from home to reach https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ - same result; ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ works though. Trying ftp from behind the company FW on FF redirects me to the htpps, though on IE it works Regards Michael -Original Message- From: Ingwie Pho

Re: broken links?

2014-06-29 Thread Ingwie Phoenix
Am 30.06.2014 um 05:22 schrieb Hebenstreit, Michael : > I tested from home to reach https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ - > same result; ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ works though. Trying > ftp from behind the company FW on FF redirects me to the htpps, though on IE > it w

Re: broken links?

2014-06-29 Thread Andrey Belevantsev
On 30.06.2014 7:22, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote: I tested from home to reach https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ - same result; ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ works though. Trying ftp from behind the company FW on FF redirects me to the htpps, though on IE it works There was