Hi!
Between e4b851a364..130ab9aafd (= r209457..r209513), most probably
with 65b0537f9e (= r209482), I see failures for eg. sh64-linux (though
only when built with config-list.mk):
g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions
-fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wa
Hi,
There was a comment in parse_c_expr, mentioning to use obstack to
build c-code string. I have attached patch for the same.
OK to commit ?
* genmatch.c (parse_c_expr): Use obstack to build c code string.
Thanks and Regards,
Prathamesh
Index: gcc/genmatch.c
==
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 04:24:37PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Between e4b851a364..130ab9aafd (= r209457..r209513), most probably
> with 65b0537f9e (= r209482), I see failures for eg. sh64-linux (though
> only when built with config-list.mk):
>
> g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DI
Hi Trevor!
On Thu, 2014-04-24 11:39:17 -0400, Trevor Saunders
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 04:24:37PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > Between e4b851a364..130ab9aafd (= r209457..r209513), most probably
> > with 65b0537f9e (= r209482), I see failures for eg. sh64-linux (though
> > only whe
Hi!
I want to uninline some basic blocks to a separate function to aid slp
vectorization.
The new pass runs just before the slp vectorization pass.
As a first try I create an new and empty function.
Which in turn will be filled with some copies of basic blocks from the original
function.
As an e
Hi!
Seems the new cost model for Cortex A8 is missing two initializer
fields:
g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions
-fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings
-Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedant
On 02/28/14 08:21, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hmm, this all reminds me about the approach Andrew Pinski and I came
up with two years ago. All in all I think it might be worth to
express folding-patterns in a more abstract way. So the md-like Lisp
syntax for this seems to be just stringent. We make use
On 03/03/14 07:05, Kai Tietz wrote:
[the possibility to use offline verification tools for the
transforms comes to my mind as well]
This is actually a pretty interesting idea. As it would allow us to
do testing for this area without side-effects by high-level passes,
target-properties, etc
Yea
Snapshot gcc-4.8-20140424 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20140424/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
*
Call for Topics and Sponsors
Workshop on Open Source Development Tools 2014 (i.e. HelloGCC Workshop)
Beijing, China
Sep. 13rd, 2014 (TBD)
HelloGCC Work Group (www.hellogcc.org)
***
10 matches
Mail list logo