Re: Regarding x86 'sete' instruction and its corresponding RTL

2014-04-04 Thread Eric Botcazou
> > RTL: (set (reg:QI 0 ax) > (eq:QI (reg:CCZ 17 flags) (const_int 0))) > > Assembly: sete %al > > > Semantics of sete instruction is (as per Intel ma

Re: WPA stream_out form & memory consumption

2014-04-04 Thread Martin Liška
On 04/03/2014 03:07 PM, Richard Biener wrote: On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Martin Liška wrote: On 04/03/2014 11:41 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Martin Liška wrote: On 04/02/2014 04:13 PM, Martin Liška wrote: On 03/27/2014 10:48 AM, Martin Liška wrote: Prev

Re: Regarding x86 'sete' instruction and its corresponding RTL

2014-04-04 Thread Niranjan Hasabnis
Hi Eric, Thank you for your reply. I referred to section 13.10, and the description there does not precisely specify the result of comparison with CC register. Yes, you are right that as per the description, comparison with CC may not have anything to do with STORE_FLAG_VALUE. But it clearly says

Re: Regarding x86 'sete' instruction and its corresponding RTL

2014-04-04 Thread Eric Botcazou
> Thank you for your reply. I referred to section 13.10, and the description > there does not precisely specify the result of comparison with CC register. Quoting section 13.10: "There are two ways that comparison operations may be used. The comparison operators may be used to compare the condit