On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 04/02/2014 04:13 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/27/2014 10:48 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
>>> Previous patch is wrong, I did a mistake in name ;)
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> On 03/27/2014 09:52 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On
Hi,
We are doing a project which requires us to write a new pass to
recalculate the chain of recurrences and use them. We would like to do
this as an ipa pass plugin. For now we have got it working as a GIMPLE
pass. When we try to change it to an IPA pass, it gives seg fault. We
believe it is
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Balajiganapathi S
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are doing a project which requires us to write a new pass to recalculate
> the chain of recurrences and use them. We would like to do this as an ipa
> pass plugin. For now we have got it working as a GIMPLE pass. When we try to
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 04/03/2014 11:41 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/02/2014 04:13 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 03/27/2014 10:48 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> Previous patch
Hi,
is there any plan to release a gcc 4.8.3?
Thanks,
Daniel.
--
Daniel F. Gutson
Chief Engineering Officer, SPD
San Lorenzo 47, 3rd Floor, Office 5
Córdoba, Argentina
Phone: +54 351 4217888 / +54 351 4218211
Skype: dgutson
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> > On 04/03/2014 11:41 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 04/02/2014 04:13 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>
> On 03/27/2014 10:48 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> >Firefox:
> >cgraph.c:869 (cgraph_create_edge_1) 0: 0.0%
> >0: 0.0% 130358176: 6.9% 0: 0.0%1253444
> >cgraph.c:510 (cgraph_allocate_node) 0: 0.0%
> >0: 0.0% 182236800: 9.7% 0: 0.0% 555600
> >toplev.c:960 (
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:34:00PM -0300, Daniel Gutson wrote:
> is there any plan to release a gcc 4.8.3?
Yes.
Marek
Snapshot gcc-4.8-20140403 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20140403/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Ops sorry to hear that.
Actually it's a new backend I'm working on the responsible for that
bug, so I guess it's relevant to post it here.
So I run this:
/home/david/uclibc/uclibc-buildroot-custom/output/build/host-gcc-final-gcc-4_7_3-release/build/./gcc/collect2
--sysroot=/home/david/uclibc/uc
Hello,
I'm a student and am currently studying compiler. I was studying
GCC's i386 MD, and I found that RTL insn mapped to 'sete' assembly
instruction seems to have exactly opposite semantics than 'sete'
instruction itself. Below are more details. If someone could clarify the
issue, or let me know
> I resend the mail, because I was given 502 error.
>
> On 04/03/2014 12:43 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >>Hello,
> >> taking latest trunk gcc, I built Firefox and Chromium. Both
> >>projects compiled without debugging symbols and -O2 on an 8-core
> >>machine.
> >>
> >>Firefox:
> >>-flto=9, peak mem
12 matches
Mail list logo