Re: libgcc/config.host pattern question

2014-03-20 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi Joel, > I tracked down a bug in building v850-rtems to a place in libgcc/config.host > where the code setting tmake_file did not append, it overwrote the previous > value. This caused v850-rtems to throw away the previous setting which > adding the newlib/sys/rtems/* directories to the include

Re: libgcc/config.host pattern question

2014-03-20 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi Joel, >> I suppose this happened in the course of my libgcc move patches for > gcc >> 4.7. Unfortunately, almost no one responded to my call for testers > in >> that timeframe, so it must have gone unnoticed since. > > We noticed but could never track it down. It initially manifested as > _hos

Re: GSoC Concepts - separate checking

2014-03-20 Thread Braden Obrzut
On 03/18/2014 10:54 PM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: On Mar 12, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Braden Obrzut wrote: My name is Braden Obrzut and I am a student from the University of Akron interested in contributing to GCC for GSoC. I am interested in working on a project related to the c++-concepts branch. In

Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple

2014-03-20 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni > wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Richard Biener >> wrote: >>> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni >>> wrote: In c_expr::c_expr, shouldn't OP_C_EXPR be

gcc-4.8-20140320 is now available

2014-03-20 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.8-20140320 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20140320/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.8 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

RE: [RFC][ARM] Naming for new switch to check for mixed hardfloat/softfloat compat

2014-03-20 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:rdsandif...@googlemail.com] > > "Thomas Preud'homme" writes: > > -mno-float causes gcc to define the macro __mips_no_float, which the > implementation can use when deciding whether to bother handling %f, etc. > I'm afraid there's nothing more sophisticated to it