On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:30:28AM +0800, lin zuojian wrote:
> Hi Chandler,
> Thanks a lot for your answer.It is pretty misleading to find out
> that DAG has schedule unit.
> --
> Regards
> lin zuojian
Hi Chandler,
I have looked into their "Machine Instr Scheduler", and find out
th
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > > How do you handle a
> > > transformation that currently tries to recursively fold something else and
> > > does the main transformation only if that simplified?
> >
> > And doesn't do the other folding (b
On 12 March 2014 15:13, lin zuojian wrote:
> Hi Chandler,
> I have looked into their "Machine Instr Scheduler", and find out
> that LLVM have not yet enable them by default.And further test find
> they are still not yet working.(e.g,-mtune=cortex-a9,a15,a53
> generates the same cod
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
How do you handle a
transformation that currently tries to recursively fold something else and
does the main transformation only if that simplified?
And doesn't do t
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 11 Mar 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 3 Mar 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > > > How do you handle a
> > > > > transformation that currently tries to recursively fold something
Hi All,
We are porting the gcc 4.8.1 to the new target and which has the pair
16 bit registers like AB or CD or EF and we modeled it in
reg_class as AB,CD and DE 16 bit pair_regs and CD ,EF as 16 bit
base_regs and A,B,C,D E and F as 8 bit as general_regs.
We are stuck with below issues like
Hi All ,
We are porting gcc4.8.1 to the new target and we created the new
.rodata section w.r.t flags by get_unnamed_section() .
Now we need to associate the global %object data of type .word or
.byte to the created .rodata section and also we need to emit the
.rodata section in the asm fil
Hi,
I'm using backtrace() to obtain call context by sending signals. But
program segfaults if the first instruction of a function receives
signal for backtrace.
ARM unwinding in libgcc uses "return_address -= 2" to get the caller
address. It is OK for normal function call with "bl xxx". But it
ca
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Peng Yuan wrote:
>
> I'm using backtrace() to obtain call context by sending signals. But
> program segfaults if the first instruction of a function receives
> signal for backtrace.
>
> ARM unwinding in libgcc uses "return_address -= 2" to get the caller
> address.
Hi, this is for 4.3.3, which is a bit old, so I'm not filing a bug.
static inline void * get_resp_ptr(U32 bkade, U32 q_id)
{
blade_data_t * bd = bfr_blade_data + ssdId;
bfr_pendcmd_q_t * pcq = bd->bfrpb_ques + q_id;
blade_resp_t *res = pcq->bfrpq_resp;
return (void *)(res +
Hi, I'm a student interested in working on GCC and want to make a
proposal of GSoC 2014 on GCC Go escape analysis.
I 've read code under /gcc/testsuit/go.* the some source code of
gofrontend, and realization of escape analysis and furthermore
optimization is needed.
Right now I have come up with
11 matches
Mail list logo
