Re: thread_local broken in gcc 4.8 ?

2014-01-06 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 03:53:13PM +1000, Conrad S wrote: > According to http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/cxx0x_status.html > the keyword "thread_local" is supported in gcc 4.8 when using -std=c++11 Bugs should be reported to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ > file foo.hpp: > class foo { > public: > in

Re: thread_local broken in gcc 4.8 ?

2014-01-06 Thread Conrad S
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Wonder if the ctor is really trivial it wouldn't be better to treat it as > not needing dynamic initialization, rather than trying to initialize it > dynamically. This is actually a reduced case scenario. In the original case the constructor

Re: Finding a relevant place for a custom GCC pass

2014-01-06 Thread Richard Biener
Sandeep K Chaudhary wrote: >Thanks for the reply Marc ! > >If I place my pass before ccp then I guess I have to implement the >means to perform calculations on my own so that it can duplicate the >functionality of ccp, right? I will also look at the source code to >see if I can modify the source c

Re: Remove spam in GCC mailing list

2014-01-06 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 08:40:07PM +0900, Tae Wong wrote: >>You want to send a mail to python-dev at python dot org. >> >>The spam still exists in gcc-bugs mailing list: >> >>There's no reason that the gcc-bugs mailing list can post bug r

Four times faster printf %e

2014-01-06 Thread Povilas Kanapickas
Hello, I have a proof-of-concept implementation of floating-point printf() which is 4 to 6 times faster than the glibc printf() in common use cases while producing exactly the same output (including rounding, etc.). I would like to contribute it to stdlibc++ as an implementation of floating-point

gcc buildbot?

2014-01-06 Thread Philippe Baril Lecavalier
Hi, Is anyone working on an implementation of buildbot for GCC? I have been experimenting with buildbot lately, and I would be glad to help in providing it. If there is interest, I could have a prototype and a detailed proposal ready in a few days. It could serve GCC, bin

Re: Four times faster printf %e

2014-01-06 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 6 January 2014 20:54, Povilas Kanapickas wrote: > > I have a proof-of-concept implementation of floating-point printf() > which is 4 to 6 times faster than the glibc printf() in common use cases > while producing exactly the same output (including rounding, etc.). I > would like to contribute it

Re: Four times faster printf %e

2014-01-06 Thread Povilas Kanapickas
On 01/06/2014 11:04 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 6 January 2014 20:54, Povilas Kanapickas wrote: >> >> I have a proof-of-concept implementation of floating-point printf() >> which is 4 to 6 times faster than the glibc printf() in common use cases >> while producing exactly the same output (inclu