On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:24:56AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, Vidya Praveen wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 07:02:52PM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
> > > On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Vidya Praveen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > This post details some thoughts on an
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 03:50:08PM +0100, Vidya Praveen wrote:
[...]
> > > I can't really insist on the single lane load.. something like:
> > >
> > > vc:V4SI[0] = c
> > > vt:V4SI = vec_duplicate:V4SI (vec_select:SI vc:V4SI 0)
> > > va:V4SI = vb:V4SI vt:V4SI
> > >
> > > Or is there any other way
I don't have the time to finish pushing through the C11 atomic work for
this release. Much of the remaining parts are in the parser, which I
know very little about, and I won't be able to do a sufficient job in
the time remaining, so I am switching my focus to the interface work and
getting the
If C11 atomics are not going into 4.9, then comments made to reject
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58016 no longer hold and I
would ask that the resolution of both it and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53769 be reconsidered.
Jeff
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Andrew M
