> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Paulo
> Matos
> Sent: 29 August 2013 11:44
> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Prototypes for builtin functions
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to hear how other architectures organize their builtin/intri
Thank you, I appreciate your response.
It seems an interesting alternative, but still I can't figure out how to do it.
I want to forge some statements in the middle of the code, in some
specific points, for instance. That is something I know how to do
already, during parsing time. The thing is, I
Hi!
On Mon, 2013-08-26 12:51:53 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko
> wrote:
> > I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not defined for linux targets
> > that do not include config/linux.h in their tm.h.
> >
> > This patch fixed build for p
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 2013-08-26 12:51:53 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko
>> wrote:
>> > I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not defined for linux targets
>> > that do not inclu