Re: [buildrobot] gcc/config/linux-android.c:40:7: error: ‘OPTION_BIONIC’ was not declared in this scope

2013-08-20 Thread Alexander Ivchenko
Hi, thanks for cathing this. I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not defined for linux targets that do not include config/linux.h in their tm.h. This patch fixed build for powerpc64le-linux and mn10300-linux. linux_libc, LIBC_GLIBC, LIBC_BIONIC should be defined for all targets. diff --git

Re: Build problem msg: xgcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory

2013-08-20 Thread George R Goffe
Florian, Thank you for your willingness to help me. I see the message 3 times during a build which appears to succeed... I run a script that checks status codes and it runs a "make install" command. Thanks for the hint with gcc-help. I sent my request to this list because this build process h

Re: Propose moving vectorization from -O3 to -O2.

2013-08-20 Thread Richard Biener
Xinliang David Li wrote: >On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Richard Biener > wrote: >> Xinliang David Li wrote: >>>+cc auto-vectorizer maintainers. >>> >>>David >>> >>>On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Cong Hou wrote: Nowadays, SIMD instructions play more and more important roles in >our >>

Recent libstdc++-v3 regressions (PCHs related?!?)

2013-08-20 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, sorry it the issue is by now well known but... I see many libstdc++-v3 regressions on at least x86_64-linux. When running the libstdc++-v3 testsuite (which uses PCHs) one gets tons of new fails like the below. That's annoying, a lot of confusing noise. Thanks! Paolo. PS: CC-ing two "ran

Re: Recent libstdc++-v3 regressions (PCHs related?!?)

2013-08-20 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi Paolo, > sorry it the issue is by now well known but... I see many libstdc++-v3 > regressions on at least x86_64-linux. When running the libstdc++-v3 > testsuite (which uses PCHs) one gets tons of new fails like the > below. That's annoying, a lot of confusing noise. same on i386-pc-solaris2.1

Re: Toolchain Build Robot

2013-08-20 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > Ok? > > Index: htdocs/testing/index.html > === > RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/testing/index.html,v > retrieving revision 1.29 > diff -u -p -r1.29 index.html > --- htdocs/testing/ind

Re: Toolchain Build Robot

2013-08-20 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > ...and this on top of that: > > Ok? That one, too. :-) Gerald

Re: Recent libstdc++-v3 regressions (PCHs related?!?)

2013-08-20 Thread David Malcolm
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 14:03 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote: > Hi, > > sorry it the issue is by now well known but... I see many libstdc++-v3 > regressions on at least x86_64-linux. When running the libstdc++-v3 > testsuite (which uses PCHs) one gets tons of new fails like the below. > That's annoyi

Re: Recent libstdc++-v3 regressions (PCHs related?!?)

2013-08-20 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, On 08/20/2013 04:41 PM, David Malcolm wrote: On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 14:03 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote: Hi, sorry it the issue is by now well known but... I see many libstdc++-v3 regressions on at least x86_64-linux. When running the libstdc++-v3 testsuite (which uses PCHs) one gets tons of n

Re: Recent libstdc++-v3 regressions (PCHs related?!?)

2013-08-20 Thread David Malcolm
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 10:41 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 14:03 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote: > > Hi, > > > > sorry it the issue is by now well known but... I see many libstdc++-v3 > > regressions on at least x86_64-linux. When running the libstdc++-v3 > > testsuite (which us

Re: i386 __atomic_compare_exchange_n not found

2013-08-20 Thread Andrew MacLeod
On 08/09/2013 12:59 PM, Joe Buck wrote: On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:23:51AM -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote: On 8/9/2013 11:05 AM, Deng Hengyi wrote: Hi Joel, I have done a test, it seems that '-march=i386' does not provide "__atomic_compare_exchange_n" libs. And '-march=i486' or '-march=pentium' c

Re: Propose moving vectorization from -O3 to -O2.

2013-08-20 Thread Xinliang David Li
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > Xinliang David Li wrote: >>On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Richard Biener >> wrote: >>> Xinliang David Li wrote: +cc auto-vectorizer maintainers. David On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Cong Hou wrote: > Nowada

Re: Steven Bosscher appointed RTL optimizers reviewer

2013-08-20 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > It's my pleasure to announce the appointment of Steven Bosscher > as RTL optimizers reviewer. > > Congratulations and Happy Hacking, Steven! > > Gerald > > PS: Please update MAINTAINERS accordingly. Thanks! I've updated MAINTAINERS in r201

Re: Steven Bosscher appointed RTL optimizers reviewer

2013-08-20 Thread Xinliang David Li
congrats! David On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> It's my pleasure to announce the appointment of Steven Bosscher >> as RTL optimizers reviewer. >> >> Congratulations and Happy Hacking, Steven! >> >> Gerald >> >>

Re: Recent libstdc++-v3 regressions (PCHs related?!?)

2013-08-20 Thread David Malcolm
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 17:02 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/20/2013 04:41 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 14:03 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> sorry it the issue is by now well known but... I see many libstdc++-v3 > >> regressions on at least x86_64-l

Re: Recent libstdc++-v3 regressions (PCHs related?!?)

2013-08-20 Thread David Malcolm
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 21:26 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 17:02 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 08/20/2013 04:41 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > > > On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 14:03 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> sorry it the issue is by now well kn

Re: Steven Bosscher appointed RTL optimizers reviewer

2013-08-20 Thread Chung-Ju Wu
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Steven Bosscher > wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >>> It's my pleasure to announce the appointment of Steven Bosscher >>> as RTL optimizers reviewer. >>> >>> Congratulations and Happy Hacking, Steven! >>> >>> Gerald >>> >>> PS: