The enum opt_code in gcc/options.h looks like this;
enum opt_code
{
N_OPTS,
OPT_SPECIAL_unknown,
OPT_SPECIAL_ignore,
OPT_SPECIAL_program_name,
OPT_SPECIAL_input_file
};
I have a feeling I am missing something. Any idea what?
Thanks,
Regards,
Hendrik Greving
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:2
Yes, you're right.
The actual message is "expected %qT but argument is of type %qT" (found in c-
typeck.c line: 4039), where tree-types are compared (tree type with tree
rhstype).
Sorry for the mistake and thank you.
Von: Jonathan Wakely
An: Klin Iop
CC:
Snapshot gcc-4.9-20130721 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20130721/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> I was creating a new gimple/folding interface and wanted some opinions
> on the interface.
>
> typedef double_int (*nonzerobits_t)(tree var);
> typedef tree (*valueizer_t)(tree var);
>
> class gimple_combine
> {
> public:
> gimple_combine(n
