On Fri, 2013-07-12 04:42:26 +, Kaushik Phatak
wrote:
> > I guess you forgot a small patch to constraints.md, because since this
> > commit which uses a new "U" constraint, the rl78-elf target won't
> > build:
> > 2013-05-31 Kaushik Phatak
> >
> > * config/rl78/rl78.md (mulqi3,mulhi3):
>> the changelog mentions the addition of the new "U" constraint, but the
>> actual patch is missing it.
Yes, I think you got it right.
I have resubmitted this part of the patch again and confirmed the commit in svn.
Best Regards,
Kaushik
Hi,
I encountered below example,
79: r169:SI=r190:SI<<0x2
115: r180:SI=r180:SI+r169:SI
116: cc:CC=cmp(r181:SI,r190:SI)
117: pc={(cc:CC==0)?L125:pc}
The register r169 is only defined by insn79, so I was hoping the
reference in insn115 can be replaced by "r190<<0x2", thus saving one
ins
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:11:11PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> FWIW basically -Werror -Wall defines a compiler version specific
> variant of C. May be great for individual developers, but it's always
> a serious mistake in any distributed Makefile.
Not always. Any project large enough (or serious
Dear Affiliate,
How are you? If you are interested in generous CPAs, please register now
as affiliate on http://www.binaryaffiliates.com/?am=40 This month, we
offer an additional $25 per trader, at the top of the regular $250, for
one selected brand.
Binary Options allow clients to profit, w
In case anyone is planning to attend the BOF on Sunday and missed the
proposal document posted last month, it can be found here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AndrewMacLeod?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=gccrestructureplan2.1.pdf
Andrew
