After a couple of tests, this failure seems to have nothing to do with nls.
Even if I remove all the flags it still fails.
I guess it can only be a case of tool versions:
Building with GCC 4.7.2, gmp 4.3.0, mpfr 2.4.1, mpc 0.8.1. Would you think any
of these could be affecting the build?
Cheers,
Turns out that this is a warning thrown by GCC that ends up as an error due to
--enable-werror-always.
Paulo Matos
> -Original Message-
> > From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of
> Paulo
> > Matos
> > Sent: 30 April 2013 14:33
> > To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> >
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Nikhil Patil
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> 1. Which passes of gcc make use of points-to information in
>> SSA_NAME_PTR_INFO (or more precisely, pt_solution) in doing
>> optimizations?
>
> All passes that query t
Dear All,
Thank you for your reply Tobias.
By the way Mr Jakup I hope my approach is make sense for you.
I changed GOMP_SPINCOUNT factor and i got speedup more than.
I attached my trace that was profiled extrae and paraver. Light blue
mean idle, Dark blue mean running, Yellow scheduling, Fork/Jo
I was wondering if someone would tell me how to pass an option that
contains slashes into 'make check'?
For example if I want to test a compiler using a simulator and the -O3
option I can run:
make check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board='mips-sim-mti32/-O3'"
I want to run this:
make check
RUNTES
I had a go at writing a custom pass to try to locate places where GCC
makes use of global state.
You can see the pass here (which I implemented using gcc-python-plugin):
https://gcc-python-plugin.readthedocs.org/en/latest/working-with-c.html#finding-global-variables
A build log from recompiling g
Hi,
> I was wondering if someone would tell me how to pass an option that
> contains slashes into 'make check'?
>
> For example if I want to test a compiler using a simulator and the -O3 option
> I can run:
>
> make check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board='mips-sim-mti32/-O3'"
>
> I want to run this
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 13:53 -0700, Matthew Fortune wrote:
>
> Using a brace expansion may help here though I haven't checked. Forward
> slashes are for the first
> set of run variants and braces are for the second set. Given the separator
> for brace expansion is ,
> then the forwards slashes wo
I have created a dynamically loadable optimization pass for optimizing
the switch statement in the core_state_transition function of the
coremark benchmark. This pass is not fully tested (I haven't run
anything other then coremark with it) and it has no controls for
limiting how much code it copie
