Jan,
It appears that the gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate
-D_PROFILE_GENERATE
testcase exposes inconsistent code generation on both x86_64 darwin and x86_64
linux at -m32.
The darwin linker developer looked at the crashing pr44777.exe executable that
this testcase
pro
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Ralf Corsepius
wrote:
> On 12/14/2012 10:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Robert Dewar wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/14/2012 3:13 PM, Cynthia Rempel wrote:
Hi,
RTEMS still supports the i386, and there are many i38
On 12/15/2012 12:42 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
If you want a port to be live show that it is live by posting regular
testresults to gcc-testresults.
Not all of this world is Linux nor backed by large teams at
companies :) We simply do not have the resources do to this.
But that's the poi
Hi,
Thanks for the fast response!
So to keep an architecture supported by GCC, we would need to:
Three or more times a year preferably either during OR after "stage3"
1. use the SVN version of gcc,
2. patch with an RTEMS patch,
3. use ./contrib/test_summary and pipe the output to a shell.
4.
On 12/15/2012 12:32 PM, Cynthia Rempel wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the fast response!
So to keep an architecture supported by GCC, we would need to:
Three or more times a year preferably either during OR after
"stage3"
1. use the SVN version of gcc, 2. patch with an RTEMS patch, 3. use
./contrib/te
I am on travel and answering from my phone so don't remember all the exact
dates and PRs.
I did test i386-rtems in the past few months but it had a build breakage and I
filed a PR. That issue was resolved but at that point about 1/4 of the rtems
targets failed to compile. I filed PRs but didn't
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20121215 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20121215/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 12/15/2012 07:02 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
I did test i386-rtems in the past few months but it had a build breakage and I
filed a PR. That issue was resolved but at that point about 1/4 of the rtems
targets failed to compile.
You likely are referring to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
