On sparc a simple test like (from the PR tree-optimization/53410 testcase):
typedef int V __attribute__((vector_size (4 * sizeof (int;
typedef unsigned int W __attribute__((vector_size (4 * sizeof (int;
void
f10 (W *p, W *q)
{
*p = *p < (((const W) { 1U, 1U, 1U, 1U
Hello,
after upgrading gcc one of my classes failed to compile. Stock
Debian/Wheezy 4.4, 4.5, 4.6 compiled the code, also compiled a version
of 4.7.0 that was built by me from sources some time ago. Clang 3.0-6
also compiled, but stock 4.7.1-7, the head of 4.7 (4.7.3 d51dc77f,
r192839) and th
On 27 October 2012 13:55, Peter A. Felvegi wrote:
>
> I didn't find anything relevant in Bugzilla when searching for 'typedef
> template'. Should I file a bug report?
If you've found what you think is a bug and you can't find an existing
Bugzilla report then yes, you should file a bug report. Thi
Hi,
I just wanted to let you know, I've updated my website at:
http://www.cyberfiber.org, hope you don't mind me notifying you.
Hope you people can fine-tune both the compiler and the assembler during
development, otherwise I will have to migrate to Microsoft Windows in
the near future.
Le
Ian Tayler (in private communication) asked that I get the part of the
build log that shows the .so and .a files being built and send it to
the list. Here it is.
-- Caroline Tice
cmt...@google.com
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag CXX --tag disable-shared --mode=compile
/usr/local/google2/cmtice/gcc-fs
On 27/10/12 15:16, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 27 October 2012 13:55, Peter A. Felvegi wrote:
I didn't find anything relevant in Bugzilla when searching for 'typedef
template'. Should I file a bug report?
If you've found what you think is a bug and you can't find an existing
Bugzilla report then
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20121027 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20121027/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 10/27/2012 10:58 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 27/10/12 15:16, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 27 October 2012 13:55, Peter A. Felvegi wrote:
I didn't find anything relevant in Bugzilla when searching for 'typedef
template'. Should I file a bug report?
If you've found what you think is a bug and
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 06:33:34AM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> some (20040709-2.c, etc.) fail with a linker error now, instead of
Hmm, packed structs. If gcc is generating mis-aligned accesses using
lwa or ld, that would be another TARGET_64BIT vs TARGET_POWERPC64
bug, wouldn't it?
--
Al
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Caroline Tice wrote:
> Ian Tayler (in private communication) asked that I get the part of the
> build log that shows the .so and .a files being built and send it to
> the list. Here it is.
I see the problem. libstdc++/libsupc++/Makefile.am overrides the
default
some (20040709-2.c, etc.) fail with a linker error now, instead of
Hmm, packed structs. If gcc is generating mis-aligned accesses using
lwa or ld, that would be another TARGET_64BIT vs TARGET_POWERPC64
bug, wouldn't it?
I have analysed it, patch on the way. The problem is LO_SUMs of
misalign
11 matches
Mail list logo
