Hello Steven,
Steven Bosscher wrote:
Can someone please add a BZ keyword for the C11/C++11 memory model? I
think it would be good to tag missed-optimizations or wrong-code bugs
for the memory model with such a special keyword to have a BZ search
find them quickly.
Adding a keyword is simple, i
Hi,
If you look at them more closely, you will see that the two different
macro's give different answers to the same problem.
If you like, I will retry at gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org, although I suppose
binut...@sourceware.org should be having a copy too.
Thanks,
Mischa.
On 10/13/2012 02:03 AM, J
Hi,
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> > > I have no problem in always returning a status change, if you are OK
> > > with that.
> >
> > I am ok with that.
>
> There is some rationale for being concerned about performance, as the
> checking routines need to read memory locations that
Hi All,
It appears that operator[] in STL containers (e.g. vector, deque) does not
check bounds any more (g++ 4.7.2).
Two-three generations ago g++ was very cautious about consistency checking but
not now.
I would appeal to developers to reconsider this pretty tough decision.
I have recently
On 15 October 2012 18:14, Ахриев Альберт wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It appears that operator[] in STL containers (e.g. vector, deque) does not
> check bounds any more (g++ 4.7.2).
If you want to discuss the C++ library then you should mail the
libstd...@gcc.gnu.org list.
> Two-three generations ago g+
On 10/15/12, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> > > > I have no problem in always returning a status change,
> > > > if you are OK with that.
> > >
> > > I am ok with that.
> >
> > There is some rationale for being concerned about performance,
> > as the checking ro
On 2012-10-15 13:21 , Lawrence Crowl wrote:
Given this, and that the other bitmap interfaces mostly return a
changed flag, we should opt for the simpler API, always returning
it. That includes the few remaining bitmap.h functions that
aren't already doing so.
Does anyone have objections to th
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
accepted the AArch64 port for inclusion in GCC and appointed
Richard Earnshaw and Marcus Shawcroft as co-maintainers.
Happy hacking!
David
On 12-10-15 7:14 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
Hi Vlad,
While browsing through old yara/ira patches, I came across this patch
of yours from several years ago:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01625.html
That work was in your IRA presentation at the GCC summit in 2007, and
it was also
