Hello All,
MELT is a high-level domain specific language to extend GCC, available as a
plugin (and a branch).
See http://gcc-melt.org/ for more.
I am releasing the third release candidate of MELT plugin 0.9.7 (for GCC 4.6,
4.7 and future 4.8)
The MELT plugin 0.9.7 release candidate 3 is avail
On 2 October 2012 20:25, Frederic Riss wrote:
> Something must be wrong, as I don't see how reload can safely move
> memory expressions other than constant addresses around like this.
I dug a bit more, and I'm still confused about this reload behavior.
Let's take this pseudo-RTL code as example:
Le 03/10/2012 10:55, Basile Starynkevitch a écrit :
> Hello All,
>
> MELT is a high-level domain specific language to extend GCC, available as a
> plugin (and a branch).
> See http://gcc-melt.org/ for more.
>
> I am releasing the third release candidate of MELT plugin 0.9.7 (for GCC 4.6,
> 4.7
Hi,
I have recently added ARM support for builtin_bswap16, which uses the
rev16 instruction when dealing with an unsigned argument.
Considering:
unsigned short myfunc(unsigned short x) {
return __builtin_bswap16(x);
}
gcc -O2 generates:
myfunc:
rev16 r0, r0
uxthr0, r0
Hello All,
MELT is a high level domain specific language to extend GCC. See
http://gcc-melt.org/
for more.
I made a mistake in uploading the latest melt 0.9.7 release candidate 3, so
here is rc3b
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 03:28:08PM +0200, Alexandre Lissy wrote:
> Le 03/10/2012 10:55, Basile
Hi,
I fall into ssa verification failure when try to pass field's
DECL_SIZE as an operand for CALL_EXPR. The fail occurs if field's size
is not a constant. In such case DECL_SIZE holds a VAR_DECL and I need
to find it's proper SSA_NAME. I thought it may be the default one but
gimple_default_def re
In C++ there is a common idiom called "initialize on first use". In its
simplest form it looks like
int& lazy_i()
{
static int i = init;
return i;
}
If the initialization is expensive or order-sensitive, this is a useful
alternative to initialization on load
(http://www.parashift.com/c++
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Joern Rennecke
>> wrote:
>>> I'll have to prepare a few more patches to (supposedly) generic
>>> code to support the ARCompact port, which we (
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012, Jason Merrill wrote:
> My implementation of dynamic initialization of TLS variables as mandated by
> the C++11 and OpenMP standards uses this idiom implicitly, so I'd really like
> to be able to optimize away multiple calls.
I'd thought that dynamic initialization of TLS varia
On 10/03/2012 07:06 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012, Jason Merrill wrote:
My implementation of dynamic initialization of TLS variables as mandated by
the C++11 and OpenMP standards uses this idiom implicitly, so I'd really like
to be able to optimize away multiple calls.
I'd tho
10 matches
Mail list logo