Yes, in addition to what Richard said, I am working on a patch to add
-fopt-report option to gcc. The first users of this optimization
report are the vectorizer passes. The hope is that other passes would
add important optimization info to -fopt-report later. Of course,
there are various dump files
I applied the new patch and it seams fine.
Thanks!
Alex
--- On Wed, 7/18/12, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> From: Alexander Monakov
> Subject: Re: selective scheduler failure
> To: "Alex Turjan"
> Cc: "Alexander Monakov" , gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Date: Wednesday, July 18, 2012, 1:42 AM
> On Wed, Jul
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Dehao Chen wrote:
> Hi, Dodji,
>
> Thanks for the comments.
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>>
>> Dehao Chen writes:
>>
>> > Thanks Richard,
>> >
>> > Hi, Dodji,
>>
>> Hi Dehao,
>>
>> > In gcc, we've met many cases where location_t and
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> Dehao Chen writes:
>
>> Hi, Dodji,
>>
>> Thanks for the comments.
>
> You are welcome.
>
> [...]
>
>> We difinitely need to modify the linemap to associate the pointer with
>> the location_t.
>
> And that is the hard part. :-)
You are rig
Im writing to you with respect to some strange SMS functionality.
In the code bellow there are 2 instructions (a builtin store and a builtin
load)
as they appear in the program flow before SMS:
(insn 134 133 135 12 tdscdma_pfu_ccdec.c:289
(set (mem:HI (plus:PSI (reg/v/f:PSI 185 [ ccdecI
Is there any reason that I can't create a new front-end translator for
gcc using QT?
Regards
--
Chris Jones @ kernel.devproj...@gmail.com
also on oracle.kernel...@gmail.com and netbsd.kernel...@gmail.com
OpenSUSE 12.1 (Primary)|TinyCore|Slitaz|Parabola|OpenIndiana|NetBSD (PC)
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:23:40 +1000
Chris Jones wrote:
> Is there any reason that I can't create a new front-end translator for
> gcc using QT?
GCC being a free GPLv3 software, you could always fork it and do that. But I am
not sure
to understand what you really are thinking of.
While current
Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:23:40 +1000
Chris Jones wrote:
Is there any reason that I can't create a new front-end translator for
gcc using QT?
GCC being a free GPLv3 software, you could always fork it and do that. But I am
not sure
to understand what you really are th
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:45:16 +1000
Chris Jones wrote:
> Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:23:40 +1000
> > Chris Jones wrote:
> >
> >> Is there any reason that I can't create a new front-end translator for
> >> gcc using QT?
> > GCC being a free GPLv3 software, you could alwa
