Hi,
I’m a representative of the NGO called “Translation for Education”. Our
organization makes non-commercial translations from various foreign
languages for those who don’t know English, but are curious to find out new
things that appear in the English-speaking Internet. Usually I (and oth
Thats very interesting, thanks for sharing.
mike
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Daniel Santos wrote:
> Yes, my topic sounds crazy huh? But you guys made it possible when you
> started optimizing out constant function pointers. (Thank you!!) This
> didn't mature to "full power" until 4.6.? (wor
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Daniel Santos wrote:
> Yes, my topic sounds crazy huh? But you guys made it possible when you
> started optimizing out constant function pointers. (Thank you!!) This
> didn't mature to "full power" until 4.6.? (works in 4.6.2, not sure
> about earlier 4.6). Now t
Terry Guo writes:
> But when check .debug_info section of .out file, I can still see entry
> for this deadstripped function:
I have two things to say about this message.
First, this message is not appropriate for the mailing list
gcc@gcc.gnu.org, which is for discussion related to the developme
I am trying to fix a multilib build problem and am hoping a build expert
can help me figure out a fix/workaround to my problem.
I am building a multilib mips compiler using '--with-synci' on the
configure line. This means that gcc will pass the '-msynci' option
to cc1 by default. The problem o
On 6/14/2012 5:41 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
I would like to point out that in libjava/sysdep/*/lockThe syncs.h many
targets still implement atomics in assembly. These utility functions
can be implemented with new atomic builtins, avoiding quite some
compexity.
This requires changes to the testsuite
On 06/18/2012 10:51 PM, Franz Fehringer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am investigating the possibilities of using decimal floating point
> arithmetic with gcc (on Linux / x86_64 to be explicit).
I'm a little rusty on this and my information might be out of date, but
this should be a good start. If I say so
"Steve Ellcey " writes:
> I am building a multilib mips compiler using '--with-synci' on the
> configure line. This means that gcc will pass the '-msynci' option
> to cc1 by default. The problem occurs when one of my multilib
> targets (like -mips32) does not support synci. This means that
>
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> I am building a multilib mips compiler using '--with-synci' on the
> configure line. This means that gcc will pass the '-msynci' option
> to cc1 by default. The problem occurs when one of my multilib
> targets (like -mips32) does not support synci. T
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 20:59 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>
> > I am building a multilib mips compiler using '--with-synci' on the
> > configure line. This means that gcc will pass the '-msynci' option
> > to cc1 by default. The problem occurs when on
Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Walter Landry wrote:
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> I thought you might be interested in some C++ expression template
>> benchmarks I have done.
>>
>> http://www.wlandry.net/Projects/FTensor#Benchmarks
>>
>> I found that GCC optimized the exp
Hi,
I have developed a small profiler which uses AMD's IBS (Instruction
Based Samling) to profile a program. With the help of it, I am able to
generate quite detailed information about the program like how many
times there is a branch miss for each branch or which instructions are
causing a lot of
Thanks for your response!
On 06/19/2012 08:40 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Daniel Santos wrote:
>> So before filing any feature request bugs, I figured I should bring my
>> discussion here first, as I believe some enhancements to gcc can better
>> enable this typ
13 matches
Mail list logo