On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
> On 29 May 2012 17:31, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am porting a private target in GCC 4.6.3 version. For my target
>>> pointer size is 24bits and word size is 32bits. Mor
Ben, we briefly chatted about this earlier. Here's more details.
I'm trying to distribute GCC testing across nodes in a cluster that do
not share a common file system. The strategy is (roughly) to avoid
using the build tree and distribute:
1- The installed tree out of 'make install'.
2- A
On Thu, 31 May 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
> This is working pretty well for everything outside of libstdc++. I can reduce
> testing from about an hour to a few minutes (we test -m32 and -m64).
>
> libstdc++ seems to be doing a few other manipulations of site.exp and
> additional setup that's def
On 12-05-31 10:28 , Joseph S. Myers wrote:
libstdc++ definitely works with installed testing (there may be a bug or
two, e.g. PR 23867, that mean a few tests don't get run that way); it's
how Mentor's testing works.
Great.
That is however installed testing with a complete source tree availab
Hello gentlemen.
Would it be ok to backport the fix for PR52558 into the 4.7 branch?
This PR is the store data race patch I have been iterating with Richi.
Doing so will avoid critical data races for both TM and the C++ memory
model.
The code is all predicated by flag_tm or !PARAM_VALUE
(PA
You've missed at least one ABI incompatibility in GCC 4.7 and later, as
demonstrated in real life by (at least) libboost_python, and distilled
into this test case.
At least these bug reports are probably caused by this ABI incompatibility:
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6919
http://gcc.gn
On 31 May 2012 22:35, James Y Knight wrote:
> You've missed at least one ABI incompatibility in GCC 4.7 and later, as
> demonstrated in real life by (at least) libboost_python, and distilled
> into this test case.
>
> At least these bug reports are probably caused by this ABI incompatibility:
> htt
On 31 May 2012 22:39, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 31 May 2012 22:35, James Y Knight wrote:
>> I understand that the ABI changes generally cannot be avoided, but a lot
>> of pain for a lot of people could be avoided by making things fail
>> obviously with a link error, instead of sometimes, arbitrar
> On 31 May 2012 22:35, James Y Knight wrote:
>> I understand that the ABI changes generally cannot be avoided, but a lot
>> of pain for a lot of people could be avoided by making things fail
>> obviously with a link error, instead of sometimes, arbitrarily, if
>> you're
>> lucky, you'll get a segf
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20120531 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20120531/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
> Thanks. Having the source tree available is not a problem, as I
> require it to copy the actual testsuites into the work tree. Adding
> a few more files from the source tree would not be a problem.
From:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/test.html
You can run the tests with a co
On 05/31/2012 05:22 PM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
Thanks. Having the source tree available is not a problem, as I
require it to copy the actual testsuites into the work tree. Adding
a few more files from the source tree would not be a problem.
From:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manu
12 matches
Mail list logo
