Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
"Iyer, Balaji V" writes:
Is there a #define in GCC that will turn on only for certain languages?
I am trying to use build_array_ref but it is giving me a undefined reference
for f951. This code that I am trying to use will ONLY execute if we have a
C/C++ cod
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Guenther [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 10:17 PM
> To: Zdenek Dvorak
> Cc: Jiangning Liu; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Jiangning Liu
> Subject: Re: A question about loop ivopt
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Zdenek Dvorak
>
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Jiangning Liu wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Richard Guenther [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 10:17 PM
>> To: Zdenek Dvorak
>> Cc: Jiangning Liu; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Jiangning Liu
>> Subject: Re: A question about
I've put together the following description of C++98/11 ABI
(in)compatibility, so people can tell which libraries need to be
recompiled. This is useful when you've bought a library that didn't
come with source code, and you're trying to figure out if you need to
buy a new version. I think this belo
Thanks Tobias,
I am wanting to call this function right before we hit the
gimplify_function_tree (), so I guess I am right before the middle-end...
-Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: Tobias Burnus [mailto:bur...@net-b.de]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 3:25 AM
Cc: i...@google.c
On 21/05/12 15:21, Christian Bruel wrote:
Options not explicitly described in the compiler before their use in a
spec rules are now rejected. So you probably need to describe it into
your target optimization file, (something like xap.opt).
OK, thanks for letting me know about this.
Cheers,
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Guenther [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 6:36 PM
> To: Jiangning Liu
> Cc: Zdenek Dvorak; Jiangning Liu; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: A question about loop ivopt
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Jiangning Liu
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Jiangning Liu wrote:
> Richard,
>
> But MODES_TIEABLE_P is a macro hook and isn't exposed to TREE level, so I
> would have to modify xxx-protos.h for all back-ends.
As far as I can tell it is exposed already to the middle-end via that
hook in that you should be ab
