Re: locating unsigned type for non-standard precision

2012-04-26 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > Georg-Johann Lay wrote: >> Richard Guenther wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: Richard Guenther wrote: >> I've run into another issue supporting a 20-bit integer for which I'd >> apprecia

Re: Question on scan_one_insn in IRA about load parameters from stack slot.

2012-04-26 Thread Bin.Cheng
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > On 04/24/2012 11:56 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote: >> >> Hi, >> In scan_one_insn, gcc checks whether an insn loads a parameter from >> its stack slot, and then >> record the fact by decrease the memory cost. >> >> What I do not understand is the ch

Re: Failed access check

2012-04-26 Thread Peter A. Felvegi
On 04/23/2012 08:20 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 23 April 2012 18:48, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: "Peter A. Felvegi" writes: Should I file a bug report? Yes, please. Thanks. Please check it's not http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24926 first Hello, it seems to be the same issue, q

Re: locating unsigned type for non-standard precision

2012-04-26 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Richard Guenther wrote: > Georg-Johann Lay wrote: >> Georg-Johann Lay wrote: >>> Richard Guenther wrote: Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > [...] > > http://gcc.gnu.org/PR51527 > > It works with 4.8 trunk but crashes with 4.7. > Did not yet track what changes made it work with 4

Re: locating unsigned type for non-standard precision

2012-04-26 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > Richard Guenther wrote: >> Georg-Johann Lay wrote: >>> Georg-Johann Lay wrote: Richard Guenther wrote: > Georg-Johann Lay wrote: >> [...] >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR51527 >> >> It works with 4.8 trunk but crash

Re: Failed access check

2012-04-26 Thread Jonathan Wakely
2012/4/26 Peter A. Felvegi: > On 04/23/2012 08:20 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >> Please check it's not http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24926 >> first > > Hello, > > it seems to be the same issue, quite dated, though. Yes, we have a number of long-standing bugs to do with access-check

[cxx-conversion] Merge from trunk

2012-04-26 Thread Diego Novillo
This merge brings cxx-conversion up to rev 186847. I added an xfail manifest file for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. When testing patches, please use contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py to check for new failures. Tested on x86_64. Diego.

GCC47 movmem breaks RA, GCC46 RA is fine

2012-04-26 Thread Paulo J. Matos
Hi, I am facing a problem with the GCC47 register allocation and my movmemqi. GCC46 dealt very well with the problem but GCC47 keeps throwing at me register spill failures. My backend has very few registers. 3 chip registers in total (class CHIP_REGS), one of them (XL) is used for memory ref

cgraph_nodes_queue replacement?

2012-04-26 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Everyone, I just recently pulled the trunk and I noticed that cgraph_nodes_queue is taken out. Is it renamed (or #defined) to something else? I am using it for some code in my Cilk plus branch. So what is the appropriate replacement for the following code? for (n = cgraph

Re: cgraph_nodes_queue replacement?

2012-04-26 Thread Jan Hubicka
> Hello Everyone, > I just recently pulled the trunk and I noticed that cgraph_nodes_queue > is taken out. Is it renamed (or #defined) to something else? I am using it > for some code in my Cilk plus branch. So what is the appropriate replacement > for the following code? > > for (

gcc-4.5-20120426 is now available

2012-04-26 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20120426 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20120426/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches