On 03/01/2012 17:43, Bruno Haible wrote:
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/language-experts
Or https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/language-experts if you want to
avoid the certificate mismatch security warning :)
cheers,
DaveK
Hello,
I pinpointed the commit that introduced the bug, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51640
Regards, Peter
Hi
Shouldn't major and minor macros in
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys/sysmacros.h be inline functions?
They prevent doing stuff like
struct T {
T() : major() {}
int major;
};
in C++. According to the C++ standard those names shoudn't be
reserved to the implementation, and thus be available
Pedro Larroy writes:
> Shouldn't major and minor macros in
> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys/sysmacros.h be inline functions?
> They prevent doing stuff like
>
> struct T {
> T() : major() {}
> int major;
> };
>
> in C++. According to the C++ standard those names shoudn't be
> reserved to th
Hi,
In neon.md, the define_expand "neon_vset_lane" has extra code to deal
with the imm operand when BYTE_BIG_ENDIAN,
unsigned int elt = INTVAL (operands[3]);
if (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
{
unsigned int reg_nelts
= 64 / GET_MODE_BITSIZE (GET_MODE_INNER (mode));
elt ^= reg_nelt
