On 12/24/2011 03:04 AM, Miles Bader wrote:
What do people think... is this a better non-virtual-dtor warning?
In general this type of diagnostic issue isn't very difficult to work
on. First, I would recommend checking if we have a Bugzilla already open
about it, otherwise open one, clarifying w
On 24 December 2011 10:50, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 12/24/2011 03:04 AM, Miles Bader wrote:
>>
>> What do people think... is this a better non-virtual-dtor warning?
>
> In general this type of diagnostic issue isn't very difficult to work on.
> First, I would recommend checking if we have a Bugzil
On 12/24/2011 11:59 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
First of all I'd check http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/changes.html#cxx and
see that I already added it ;-)
Oh indeed, now I remember it ;)
Paolo.
On 12/24/2011 12:03 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 12/24/2011 11:59 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
First of all I'd check http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/changes.html#cxx
and see that I already added it ;-)
Oh indeed, now I remember it ;)
which reminds me, that probably, since we are mentioning new warnin
2011/12/24 Jonathan Wakely :
> On 24 December 2011 10:50, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> On 12/24/2011 03:04 AM, Miles Bader wrote:
>>>
>>> What do people think... is this a better non-virtual-dtor warning?
>
> First of all I'd check http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/changes.html#cxx and
> see that I already add
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20111224 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20111224/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Miles Bader wrote:
> What do people think... is this a better non-virtual-dtor warning?
this one makes utmost sense.
-- Gaby
gccad...@gcc.gnu.org writes:
> Snapshot gcc-4.7-20111224 is now available on
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20111224/
oooh a christmas present!
merry xmas~
-miles
--
「寒いね」と話しかければ「寒いね」と答える人のいるあったかさ [俵万智]
