On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:08:15AM +0200, Jason Merrill wrote:
> I'll backport that hunk, thanks for catching this.
Great ! You're welcome Jason.
Yvan
Hi Gabriel,
I also agree with you that GCC architecture is messy, and that scares newscomer
a lot.
Yes, but the way we improve it isn't, in my opinion, adding more GC.
First we would like to remove complexity, and I do not think we should
start by focusing on storage management until we get
GCC 4.6.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
The first release candidate for GCC 4.6.2 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6.2-RC-20111019
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 180180.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release
Hello,
On 10/19/2011 02:13 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
[...]
If all goes well, I'd like to release 4.6.2 in the middle of the next week.
will there be another release candidate early next week?
Is there a chance that these ARM regressions get fixed in this release?
(A) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:57:26PM +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 10/19/2011 02:13 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> [...]
> >If all goes well, I'd like to release 4.6.2 in the middle of the next week.
>
> will there be another release candidate early next week?
If possible, not.
> Is there a chanc
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 00:45 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Chiheng Xu wrote:
>
> > I recommend people interested in automatic dynamic memory management
> > to read this book:
> > Garbage Collection: Algorithms For Automatic Dynamic Memory
> > Management(Richard
Basile -
2011/10/18 Basile Starynkevitch :
> Still, I find strange that while some very smart & nice GCC guys want to get
> rid of Ggc,
> no patch made into the trunk towards that goal (which I Basile dislike and
> don't share,
> so don't expect me Basile to work on this.).
Well, there is my RT
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 04:31:48PM +0300, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
> In the end I believe that it is the patches that talk. Whatever
> patches are going to be submitted, reviewed and accepted, that is
> going to be GCC's future, be it memory management, or something els
I was beginning to work on
On 14/10/11 19:31, Ben Gamari wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 18:38:26 +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> On 14/10/11 17:40, Ben Gamari wrote:
>>> I was recently trying to test GCC's behavior in producing various types
>>> of ARM relocations. In particular, I was trying to produce an
>>> R_ARM_JUMP24
-Original Message-
From: Gary Funck [mailto:g...@intrepid.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 5:00 PM
To: Jakub Jelinek
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Joseph S. Myers
Subject: Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09)
On 09/09/11 09:09:30, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> [...] What is the status of lra
On 19 October 2011 08:42, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Gabriel,
>
>>> I also agree with you that GCC architecture is messy, and that scares
>>> newscomer a lot.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, but the way we improve it isn't, in my opinion, adding more GC.
>> First we would like to remove complexity, and I do not think
Szanując Państwa prywatność oraz mając na uwadze przepisy Ustawy o świadczeniu
usług drogą elektroniczną, zwracam się z zapytaniem o możliwość przesłania
oferty handlowej.
Jeżeli jesteście Państwo zainteresowani otrzymaniem oferty dotyczącej
profesjonalnej obsługi księgowej Państwa Firmy - pro
Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2011/10/18 Bob Breuer :
>> Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> 2011/10/17 Bob Breuer :
Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote:
>> Google finds a mention of longjmp failing with -fomit-frame-pointer:
>> http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2005-02/msg001
On 10/19/2011 02:05 PM, Bob Breuer wrote:
> Is it possible to force a
> stackframe by just adding a suitable attribute to either the setjmp
> function prototype, or the function which calls setjmp?
The only thing I can think of that'll be portable to a large number
of versions of GCC is
{
i
I'd like to create a new "fission" branch on the GIT mirror at
ssh://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git. This branch will host the changes that
Sterling and I will be making to support splitting the debug info into
separate files -- and, as a byproduct, fixing the pubnames and
pubtypes tables so they can be u
Hello Everyone,
Is there a function (or a series of functions) in GCC using which I can
convert a register number (either in RTX or int) to DWARF code?
Any help is greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
Basile Starynkevitch
> I would like to add destroyable objects into Ggc (the GCC garbage
> collector, see files gcc/ggc*.[ch]).
>
> The main motivation is to permit C++ objects to be garbage collected
> (I discussed that briefly in the Gcc meeting at Google in London):
> adding destroyable object
Hi, all
I think this issue causes the gdb crash on XP.
You can see the thread: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2011-10/msg00056.html
My many friends and I can reproduce this crash issue, but no problem on Win7.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Bob Breuer wrote:
> Kai Tietz wrote:
>> 2011/10/18 Bob
te available from gcc.gnu.org
>
> The first release candidate for GCC 4.6.2 is available from
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6.2-RC-20111019
>
> and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 180180.
>
> I have so far bootstrapped and tested the rele
"Iyer, Balaji V" writes:
> Is there a function (or a series of functions) in GCC using which I can
> convert a register number (either in RTX or int) to DWARF code?
Are you looking for DWARF_FRAME_REGNUM?
If not, what do you mean by DWARF code? Do you mean inside gcc, or in
code compile
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:17:47 -0700
Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> Basile Starynkevitch
> > I would like to add destroyable objects into Ggc (the GCC garbage
> > collector, see files gcc/ggc*.[ch]).
> >
> > The main motivation is to permit C++ objects to be garbage collected
> > (I discussed that briefl
21 matches
Mail list logo
