Hey Sho,
> I totally agree with this point.
> Currently, I'm planning to implement tied task using breath-first
> scheduler wrote in
> section 3.1 of "Evaluation of OpenMP Task Scheduling Strategies" by Nanos
> Group.
> http://www.sarc-ip.org/files/null/Workshop/1234128788173__TSchedStrat-iwomp08
My target needs a scratch register to store a register in one register class
and it needs to use memory to copy from one register class to another.
I have store and reload_out patterns for those registers. When reload
tries to copy data from one register class to another, it just stores the
regist
H.J. Lu schrieb:
My target needs a scratch register to store a register in one register class
and it needs to use memory to copy from one register class to another.
I have store and reload_out patterns for those registers. When reload
tries to copy data from one register class to another, it jus
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> H.J. Lu schrieb:
>>
>> My target needs a scratch register to store a register in one register
>> class
>> and it needs to use memory to copy from one register class to another.
>> I have store and reload_out patterns for those registers.
Hello again Andreas,
(I just forgot to Cc to GCC ML, so resending this email)
> Right, start with distributing the queues and then think about load
> balancing.
OK.
> I would say don't worry too much about cut-offs at this point. Finding a
> good cut-off strategy that works without drawbacks is
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20110430 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20110430/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
The GCC Steering Committee appointed me to the role of GCC Release
Manager on March 22, 2000, as part of the GCC 3.0 release cycle. Eleven
years and umpteen releases later, it's time for me to relinquish that
position. I am just as interested in GCC as ever, but I simply no
longer have the time t