Re: -flto / -flto-partition=none question on ia64-hp-hpux11.23

2011-02-28 Thread Steve Ellcey
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 18:45 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote: > > > > I am looking at an lto bug on ia64-hp-hpux11.23. If I compile > > g++.dg/torture/pr33572.C with -flto on this platform I get: > > > > ld: Unsatisfied symbol "__gcc_personalit

Re: gcc-4.5/4.4: Bug in .subreg1 pass?

2011-02-28 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Denis Chertykov schrieb: 2011/2/26 Georg-Johann Lay : Ok, this is the patch I meant: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=86842 it allows just Pmode in r29:r28 because of some spill failures in PR15417 and PR12017. It was a stupid workaround. I think that the problem exists any

Re: -flto / -flto-partition=none question on ia64-hp-hpux11.23

2011-02-28 Thread Richard Guenther
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote: > On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 18:45 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote: >> > >> > I am looking at an lto bug on ia64-hp-hpux11.23.  If I compile >> > g++.dg/torture/pr33572.C with -flto on this plat

Re: -flto / -flto-partition=none question on ia64-hp-hpux11.23

2011-02-28 Thread Steve Ellcey
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 23:56 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > The gcc_personality is provided by libgcc_s I think, it's what you > get when compiling C code with -fexceptions and install > cleanup handlers. > > It seems that LTO comes to the conclusion that the C++ specific > personality is not ne

Re: how can I write a right V32QI Unpack Low Data insn pattern?

2011-02-28 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Liu writes: > I write a v16hi mode Unpack Low Data insn pattern and it is OK. v8si > and v4di modes are OK, too. > But the v32qi mode Unpack Low Data insn pattern get error like: > ../../gcc-4.5.1/gcc/config/mips/hr.md:509: error: expected identifier > or ‘(’ before ‘goto’ > ../../gcc-4.5.1/gcc/c

Re: Triplet for ARM Linux HardFP ABI, again

2011-02-28 Thread Steve Langasek
Here is an amended patch that handles Ada as EABI-only on ARM. Are there any other comments on the appropriateness of this globbing change? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the wo

Re: -flto / -flto-partition=none question on ia64-hp-hpux11.23

2011-02-28 Thread Richard Henderson
On 03/01/2011 09:27 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote: > The libgcc_s on the ia64-hp-hpux* platform, at least when built using > the system unwind library, does not have a gcc personality function and > so far it has not needed one. How is that possible? Do any of the gcc.dg/cleanup-*.c tests work? r~

Re: -flto / -flto-partition=none question on ia64-hp-hpux11.23

2011-02-28 Thread Steve Ellcey
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 10:14 +1000, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 03/01/2011 09:27 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote: > > The libgcc_s on the ia64-hp-hpux* platform, at least when built using > > the system unwind library, does not have a gcc personality function and > > so far it has not needed one. > > How

Re: Triplet for ARM Linux HardFP ABI, again

2011-02-28 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 16:12:32 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Here is an amended patch that handles Ada as EABI-only on ARM. > diff --git a/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in > b/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in > index b64ba55..7559efb 100644 > --- a/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in > +++