Re: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums

2010-09-22 Thread Rodrigo Rivas
> I saw the flag situation after I sent my message. There must be a "Keeper of > the Sacred Tree Flag Set" There are a few comments en tree.h about that, I if remember correctly... > I get the idea the real estate is at a premium and consuming flags could be > a problem. > Perhaps there is a con

Where are the new GCC releases?

2010-09-22 Thread Artem S. Tashkinov
Hello, Something tells me that GCC 4.4.5 and 4.5.2 should have been released a long time ago, but I don't even see regular GCC status updates. Are all release managers on leave? Best wishes, Artem

Re: Where are the new GCC releases?

2010-09-22 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote: > Hello, > > Something tells me that GCC 4.4.5 and 4.5.2 should have been > released a long time ago, but I don't even see regular GCC > status updates. Are all release managers on leave? What is it that makes you feel that way? ;) Yeah,

Re: Where are the new GCC releases?

2010-09-22 Thread Joe Buck
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:49:58AM -0700, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote: > Hello, > > Something tells me that GCC 4.4.5 and 4.5.2 should have been > released a long time ago, but I don't even see regular GCC > status updates. Are all release managers on leave? Who or what is this "something" that tell

Re: Where are the new GCC releases?

2010-09-22 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:15:19PM -0700, Joe Buck wrote: > Who or what is this "something" that tells you that? 4.5.1 was released > August 8th. It would be very unusual to see a 4.5.2 this quickly, and > no schedule was announced. > > For 4.4.5, see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-09/msg00146.h

RE: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums

2010-09-22 Thread Hargett, Matt
On 09/21/2010 07:05 PM, Rodrigo Rivas wrote: >>> I had to initialize the variable nested_being_defined to get it to compile >>> (possible uninitialized warning). I initialized it to false. >>> >> Ok, actually it is never used uninitialized, but let's get rid of the >> warning. >> > I sa

[PATCH] for Re: new mirror

2010-09-22 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Slevin Black wrote: > http://mirrorpool.in/ mirroring gcc at http://mirrorpool.in/Gcc/. > The mirror will be updated daily and is available to the public. The > maintainer can be reached at top...@gmail.com. > It`s located in Chicago, UNITED STATES. Thanks for setting up this

Re: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums

2010-09-22 Thread Rodrigo Rivas
I had to initialize the variable nested_being_defined to get it to compile (possible uninitialized warning).  I initialized it to false. >>> Ok, actually it is never used uninitialized, but let's get rid of the >>> warning. >>> >> I saw that it was never used uninitialized and was s

Re: Autoconf tests, libtool symlist files, undefined behavior, and LTO

2010-09-22 Thread t66...@gmail.com
Hello all, I don't know if my problem suites this description. On 31/03/2010 6:52 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello gcc and libtool lists, Summary: both Autoconf-generated configure tests as well as some Libtool construct invoke undefined behavior. Question is how to deal with it, and whether GC

Re: Where are the new GCC releases?

2010-09-22 Thread Eric Botcazou
> The performance testing didn't show performance regressions. > 4.4.5 RC1 is currently blocked by PR45234, either it needs to be fixed > soon, or reverted. I'd like to backport the fix for middle-end/44763 before the RC. May I? -- Eric Botcazou

Re: Where are the new GCC releases?

2010-09-22 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:20:43AM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > The performance testing didn't show performance regressions. > > 4.4.5 RC1 is currently blocked by PR45234, either it needs to be fixed > > soon, or reverted. > > I'd like to backport the fix for middle-end/44763 before the RC. Ma