"Darryl L. Miles" writes:
> So my next question is what support is there in the various formats,
> technologies and runtime libraries to provide a backwards compatible
> solution, such that a binary from one system when put on another can
> have any hardware incompatibilities detected at the soon
BLUE 3TOO writes:
> Can somebody quickly explain what the bit fields are for? thanks
>
> unsigned int precision : 10;
> unsigned no_force_blk_flag : 1;
> unsigned needs_constructing_flag : 1;
> unsigned transparent_aggr_flag : 1;
> unsigned restrict_flag : 1;
> unsigned contain
On 07/13/2010 11:13 AM, Jie Zhang wrote:
I got this when trying to access
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44921
Software error:
Can't rename data/versioncache.Xg5KN to versioncache at globals.pl
line 306.
For help, please send mail to the webmaster
(sourcemas...@sourceware.org), g
Ian Lance Taylor writes:
> Unfortunately, as far as I know, no such solution was ever adopted for
> the x86 family. So this does not help your immediate problem, and will
> not help it until somebody implements such an approach for x86.
The Sun assembler, linker, and runtime linker implement th
> However, although no one currently sells FPA hardware, it is widely
> supported as the only floating point model emulated by the Linux
> kernel, and people have to use it when compiling stuff to run on OABI
> systems, which include boards currently on the market based on ARMv4
> (no t) such as th
Rainer Orth writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
>
>> Unfortunately, as far as I know, no such solution was ever adopted for
>> the x86 family. So this does not help your immediate problem, and will
>> not help it until somebody implements such an approach for x86.
>
> The Sun assembler, linker,
On 9 Jul 2010, at 17:28, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
RUNTESTFLAGS="CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=--sysroot=/path/to/somewhere
--target_board=unix/-foo/-bar"
Please, once you find out, add this info to http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Testing_GCC
done (and amended the sim. section to refer to the second simulato
Good morning GNU,
I'm launching a new network of indie game development called
PAGE (the full name is not to be released until opening date), which will
assist independent game developers gain clients and earn real profits (you
will benefit even as a non profit organization), along with having acc
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Rainer Orth writes:
>
>> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
>>
>>> Unfortunately, as far as I know, no such solution was ever adopted for
>>> the x86 family. So this does not help your immediate problem, and will
>>> not help it until somebody im
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 6:39 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Rainer Orth writes:
>>
>>> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
>>>
Unfortunately, as far as I know, no such solution was ever adopted for
the x86 family. So this does not help your imme
"H.J. Lu" writes:
> On x86, it is OK for binary to have ISAs beyond the base ISA
> as long as proper ISA check is used before the new ISA code is
> entered. However, we should have a way to mark the base ISA.
That's what the Sun assembler does by default. If you need to override
its findings if
On 07/08/2010 10:58 PM, Maxiwell Garcia wrote:
Hi,
I am writing a paper about instruction-set architecture simulators. In
first time, I used gcc-4.4.0 and the compilation time reached 33
minutes (with -O3) for my simulator and the performance reached 270
MIPS (Million instruction per second). Wh
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 07/08/2010 10:58 PM, Maxiwell Garcia wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am writing a paper about instruction-set architecture simulators. In
>> first time, I used gcc-4.4.0 and the compilation time reached 33
>> minutes (with -O3) for my simulator a
Hello, in the trunk's documentation
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/GTY-Options.html I am reading:
> variable_size
> The type machinery expects the types to be of constant size.
> When this is not true, for example, with structs that have
> array fields or unions, th
On 13 July 2010 14:47, IainS wrote:
>
> On 9 Jul 2010, at 17:28, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>
>>> RUNTESTFLAGS="CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=--sysroot=/path/to/somewhere
>>> --target_board=unix/-foo/-bar"
>>>
>>
>> Please, once you find out, add this info to
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Testing_GCC
>
> done (a
> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
> > Unfortunately, as far as I know, no such solution was ever adopted for
> > the x86 family. So this does not help your immediate problem, and will
> > not help it until somebody implements such an approach for x86.
>
> The Sun assembler, linker, and runtime linker i
On 13 July 2010 11:09, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> BLUE 3TOO writes:
>
>> Can somebody quickly explain what the bit fields are for? thanks
>>
>> unsigned int precision : 10;
>> unsigned no_force_blk_flag : 1;
>> unsigned needs_constructing_flag : 1;
>> unsigned transparent_aggr_flag :
On 07/13/2010 04:53 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 07/08/2010 10:58 PM, Maxiwell Garcia wrote:
Hi,
I am writing a paper about instruction-set architecture simulators. In
first time, I used gcc-4.4.0 and the compilation time reached 33
min
On 07/13/2010 04:53 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 07/08/2010 10:58 PM, Maxiwell Garcia wrote:
Hi,
I am writing a paper about instruction-set architecture simulators. In
first time, I used gcc-4.4.0 and the compilation time reached 33
min
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 04:53 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/08/2010 10:58 PM, Maxiwell Garcia wrote:
Hi,
I am writing a paper about instruction-set architectur
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20100713 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20100713/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Jul 10, 2010, at 7:07 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Todd,
>
> On Wed, 19 May 2010, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
>> I'm writing to report a discrepancy in
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html
>>
>> I just discovered that if gmp is boot strapped during gcc build and an
>> older m4 exists, w
I think I've seen this one, it's something like this: GNU flex calls M4
when you run flex. GMP disables M4 and runs flex; flex then tries to
run m4-not-used (or whatever it's called) instead of m4.
Hello,
It will be appreciated if anyone could help send me the copyright
assignment forms. I need them to submit patches to gcc. I think it
should be an assignment for all future changes.
Thanks
Eric
Hi,
2010/7/13 Basile Starynkevitch :
> The type machinery then provides allocators that take a parameter indicating
> an exact size of object being allocated (like malloc does)
>
> and the exemple should better be
>
>
> Then the objects of struct sorted_fields_type are allocated in GC memory as
25 matches
Mail list logo
