-disable-libgcc and/or -disable-fixincludes are useful, depending on your goal.
Like if you just want to compile C to assembly or object files.
It fails, but only after doing what I want anyway.
make[2]: *** No rule to make target
`../build-sparc-sun-solaris2.10/fixincludes/fixinc.sh', neede
It might also be necessary to configure for i586-sun-solaris2.10 instead of
i586-solaris2.10.
Something I read said you can use various shorter forms, and I like the idea
for convenience and to avoid those "pc"s and "unknown"s,
but this seems to have bitten me a number of times, not just today.
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 5:09 AM, ajmcello wrote:
>> I've got a quad core 3.2Ghz FreeBSD-8 system with 8GB of ram. I
>> compiled and installed Cloog-PPL and PPL, mpfr, gmp, mpc, polylib,
>> etc. I'm using make -j 4, and my gcc compile has be
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Jay K wrote:
It seems using GNU as might still be slightly preferred in order to move
data (jump tables) out of .text and into read only data, like, you know,
"the less that is executable, the more secure". Though for locality,
.text might be better.
Note that you can al
Hi,
I have a problem to compile the libgcc2 with a new gcc backend.
I have a little processor with 4 registers A X Y and R0(0) with 32 Bit.
R0(0) is the stackpointer and Y is the basepointer.
So i only have the registers A and X to calculate.
It always gave me an error that there are to less spi
On x86_64-apple-darwin10, we fail the lto testcase...
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.5.999-20100508/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.5.999-20100508/darwin_objdir/gcc/ -O0 -fwhopr -c
-o c_lto_20081222_1.o
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.5.999-20100508/gcc-4.6-20100508/gcc/testsuite/gc
Hello,
We have just merged the branch st/cli-fe (a gcc front end for CLI)
from a 4.3 realse to 4.5.
This merge has broken the compiler and for a simple helloworld test it
fails with the error
cil1: internal compiler error: in execute_one_pass, at passes.c:1525
This error is reporting that the '
On 10/05/2010 14:30, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Are there any standards in effect which would dictate that
> the alias of a hidden function is valid?
Visiblity doesn't apply to functions, it applies to symbols. Symbols are
textual names with a linked value that exist in object files. The compiler
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 04:17:26PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 14:30, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> > Are there any standards in effect which would dictate that
> > the alias of a hidden function is valid?
>
> Visiblity doesn't apply to functions, it applies to symbols. Symbols are
> te
On 10/05/2010 16:19, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Compiler executable checksum: c54eb6db87684e4d5a5bb9ad02c2b2c4
> 20081222_1.c:16: error: 'EXT_x' aliased to undefined symbol 'INT_x'
>
> which I assume means this error message is coming from the compiler and not
> the linker. So it still unclear to me i
On 10/05/2010 17:16, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 16:19, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
>> Compiler executable checksum: c54eb6db87684e4d5a5bb9ad02c2b2c4
>> 20081222_1.c:16: error: 'EXT_x' aliased to undefined symbol 'INT_x'
> The error comes from finish_aliases_1 in varasm.c, where it is suppressed
Jay K writes:
> -disable-libgcc and/or -disable-fixincludes are useful, depending on your
> goal.
>
> Like if you just want to compile C to assembly or object files.
>
>
> It fails, but only after doing what I want anyway.
>
> make[2]: *** No rule to make target
> `../build-sparc-sun-solaris2.
On 05/10/2010 12:39 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Albert Cohen writes:
I agree. Or even, =c++0x or =gnu++0x
On the other hand, I fail to see the differen between =single and
=fast, and the explanation about "the same memory word" is not really
relevant as memory models typically tell you ab
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Karel Gardas wrote:
> with recent fixes into profile mode I've succeed even using it for
> MICO[1] on OpenSolaris platform. Is there any tool which
> translates call stacks to humans or is there any documentation/hint
> how to use generated call stack information t
I am trying to speedup the load and startup time of a shared library.
After reading Ulrich Drepper's paper on "How to write shared libraries",
it seems that the easiest thing to try would be to reduce the number of
symbols that are globally visible. After carefully adding
__attribute__((visibi
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 05:20:22PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 17:16, Dave Korn wrote:
> > On 10/05/2010 16:19, Jack Howarth wrote:
> >
> >> Compiler executable checksum: c54eb6db87684e4d5a5bb9ad02c2b2c4
> >> 20081222_1.c:16: error: 'EXT_x' aliased to undefined symbol 'INT_x'
>
> >
Ok if I do both or the emails are just annoying?
I find that bugs are often ignored just as well (but not lost/forgotten,
granted. :) )
Thanks,
- Jay
> To: jay.kr...@cornell.edu
> CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: -disable-fixincludes doesn't quite w
Vivek Verma writes:
> I am trying to speedup the load and startup time of a shared
> library. After reading Ulrich Drepper's paper on "How to write shared
> libraries", it seems that the easiest thing to try would be to reduce
> the number of symbols that are globally visible. After carefully
>
Jay K writes:
> Ok if I do both or the emails are just annoying?
As far as I'm concerned, it's fine to do both.
> I find that bugs are often ignored just as well (but not lost/forgotten,
> granted. :) )
Agreed on both counts.
Ian
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Amker.Cheng wrote:
>> Ah, I forgot pro/epilogue generation, but I think that's the only other
>> thing that happens after reload. That is a special case: it has to generate
>> strict rtl that directly matches the insns it wants. You'll probably have to
>> arrange
Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> Speaking of which, we should probably formally deprecate the old arm-elf
> derived targets in 4.6 so that we can remove them in 4.7.
> Similarly, we should deprecate support for the FPA on ARM.
I agree.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
m...@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-338
Hi :
I'm working on a fpu which cannot work fpload insns right, so I have
to use a GPR
reg as temp reg to first load mem into GPR then move GPR into fpu register.
I have handled most cases but the case gcc handling call clobbered fpu
registers.
since it is in reload pass, I have no available GPR
Andrew MacLeod writes:
> -fmemory-model=single - Enable all data races introductions, as they
> are today. (relax all 4 internal restrictions.)
One could still use this mode with a multi-threaded program as long as
explicit synchronization is done, right?
-Miles
--
Road, n. A strip of land
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 05:15:51PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> The most obvious change in your data is that the number of hash
> buckets dropped from 4099 to 2053. It's entirely possible that you
> were close to the boundary of when the linker decides to increase the
> number of hash buckets.
24 matches
Mail list logo
