Hello
Is there any progress or start yet in implemententing export for C++ templates ?
A search in the mailing list archive shows the last time the issue was
discussed was in 2006.
Why is everybody such not interested in this ? It would be such a
great feature, especially for
a leading C++ implem
Hi, all!
I have a question concerning GGC and gengtype in particular.
The question is: can I have DIFFERENT <>-ed types and
variables with the SAME NAMES in two DIFFERENT front ends?
More expanded: I am trying to implement a front-end of a C-derived
language (say, Z); and have used the c-parser.c
Status
==
GCC 4.4.3 release tarballs have been uploaded, the 4.4 branch is again
open for commits under the usual release branch rules.
I'll announce the release once mirrors had some time to download it.
Quality Data
Priority # Change from Last Report
Status
==
The trunk is still in regression and documentation fixes only
mode, we still have several P1 regressions that need to be fixed
before branching. There will be a release candidate made available
when there are no remaining P1 regressions on the trunk.
If you have found a bug that yo
Hello all,
I am doing a port for a 32bit a target in GCC 4.4.0. The target
supports (base + offset) addressing mode for QImode store instructions
but not for QImode load instructions. GCC doesn't take the middle
path. It either supports an addressing mode completely and doesn't
support at all. I t
When compiling a transactional program, the compiler doesn't recognize
"__sync_add_and_fetch_8", it shows the following error message :
libitm.so: undefined reference to `__sync_add_and_fetch_8'
I suppose that this is an interinsic function and doesn't need a
linker, is it a bug ?
To configure G
Near the end of assign_hard_reg in ira-color.c, there is this code:
if (min_full_cost > mem_cost)
{
if (! retry_p && internal_flag_ira_verbose > 3 && ira_dump_file !=
NULL)
fprintf (ira_dump_file, "(memory is more profitable %d vs %d) ",
mem_cost, min_full_cost);
Ian Bolton wrote:
Near the end of assign_hard_reg in ira-color.c, there is this code:
if (min_full_cost > mem_cost)
{
if (! retry_p && internal_flag_ira_verbose > 3 && ira_dump_file !=
NULL)
fprintf (ira_dump_file, "(memory is more profitable %d vs %d) ",
mem_cost
On 01/21/2010 06:22 AM, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
Hello all,
I am doing a port for a 32bit a target in GCC 4.4.0. The target
supports (base + offset) addressing mode for QImode store instructions
but not for QImode load instructions. GCC doesn't take the middle
path. It either supports an addressing
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20100121 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20100121/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
Timothy Madden writes:
> Is there any progress or start yet in implemententing export for C++
> templates ?
Not to my knowledge.
The C++0x standards committee considered deprecating export for C++0x,
but I think they have decided to retain it for now.
> Why is everybody such not interested i
"Alexei I. Adamovich" writes:
> I have a question concerning GGC and gengtype in particular.
> The question is: can I have DIFFERENT <>-ed types and
> variables with the SAME NAMES in two DIFFERENT front ends?
Yes.
Needless to say, I don't recommend it. What you describe sounds like
a recipe f
Riyadh Baghdadi writes:
> To configure GCC, I use : ./configure --disable-bootstrap
> --prefix=GCC_PREFIX_FOLDER --disable-multilib --enable-languages=c,c++
> --enable-shared --enable-threads
Since you are using x86, add --with-arch=pentium4 or whatever is
appropriate for your target.
Ian
13 matches
Mail list logo
