> There are some other quirks with the MicroBlaze architecture.
> The cmp/cmpu instructions only take a register. Other instructions
> which can be used for equality or signed comparisons (xor or sub)
> can take an immediate operand. I'll see how they can be added.
You can probably convince comb
quot;0123456789#$"
+ .zero 2102063220
.ascii "$#9876543210"
- .ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.5.0 20091226 (experimental)"
+ .ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.5.0 20091217 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-12/msg00170.html
Daniel Franke wrote:
Hi all.
I'm in the process of revamping the fortran-frontend to use trees instead of
linked lists in its array-constructor representation (initial patch at [1]).
By now, I'm hunting down the last regressions. For one regression, I have no
idea how to deal with it.
The p
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 11/30/2009 09:47 PM, Michael Witten wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Kaveh R. GHAZI
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The patch which makes the MPC library a hard requirement for GCC
>>> bootstrapping has been approved today.
>>
>> Out of
