On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 18:12 -0300, Pedro Lamarão wrote:
> 2009/8/11 Pedro Lamarão :
>
> > I've recently started my contributions to the gcc-in-cxx project, and
> > eventually decided on the qsort suggestion because it seems the
> > easiest one.
>
> Attached is a much more extensive patch replacin
Laurent GUERBY writes:
> On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 23:33 +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 12:00 +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:08:00 +0200, Matthias Klose
> > > wrote:
> > > >On 12.08.2009 23:07, Martin Guy wrote:
> > > >> On 8/12/09, Joel She
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Link a small program with -rdynamic, one which defines a globally
> visible function which is not called. Run objdump -T and see if you can
> see that symbol in the output.
>
> If you follow this path you must do the in_tree_ld/ld_ver dance so that
Online Poker, and have Fun!
http://tinyurl.com/mogdze
Enjoy!
mitch...@codesourcery.com (Mark Mitchell) writes:
> [...] In my opinion, the single hardest issue we face with respect
> to 4.5 is how to handle the VTA branch. [...] The problem it's
> setting out to solve is definitely important, but the scope of this
> particular solution frightens me. [..
Hi!
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 09:51:30AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> I suspect that that comment is no longer relevant. At least, I can't
> seem to find the mask. Perhaps somebody else knows.
I got. Since no anybody more has commented, let us be sure that the
mask mechanism has gone. [I've r
Forgot RID_LAST_MODIFIER
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 08:29:21PM +0400, Alexei I. Adamovich wrote:
> So for the sake of those who will develop C-derived front ends, should
> we change the comment like below:
> > /* Reserved identifiers. This is the union of all the keywords for C,
> >C++, and Obje
2009/8/29 Magnus Fromreide :
>
> Why the changes to gcc/system.h where you unpoision malloc and realloc?
> Why the changes to libcpp/system.h where you unpoision malloc, realloc,
> calloc and strdup?
Including requires them for some reason.
I haven't really looked into it.
--
P.
Listmates,
First post, and more of a curiosity than a problem. Years ago I worked
extensively with c, fortran, etc. (late '80s, early 90s). I do my own office
infrastructure/networking/groupware, etc. all with linux and open source
software. Occasionally that requires me to dust off my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David C. Rankin wrote:
> Listmates,
>
> First post, and more of a curiosity than a problem. Years ago I
> worked extensively with c, fortran, etc. (late '80s, early 90s). I
> do my own office infrastructure/networking/groupware, etc. all with
> linux a
On Saturday 29 August 2009 08:45:37 pm Philip Herron wrote:
>
> Try not to ask questions like this in GCC, GCC-help is for help on
> using gcc etc.
>
> --Phil
>
Sorry Phil,
I read the guidelines at http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html before I posted.
The
guidelines say:
Open lists:
David C. Rankin wrote:
> * gcc-help is a relatively high volume list for people searching for help
> in building or using GCC.
>
> * gcc is a high volume list for general development discussions about
> GCC.
> I didn't see the distinction, and I'm still not sure I do.
By "ab
On Saturday 29 August 2009 10:17:57 pm you wrote:
> David C. Rankin wrote:
> > * gcc-help is a relatively high volume list for people searching for
> > help in building or using GCC.
> >
> > * gcc is a high volume list for general development discussions about
> > GCC.
> >
> > I didn't
13 matches
Mail list logo
